<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --> <!-- Parent-Version:1.961.98 --> <!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html --> <!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays laws copyright" --> <!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" --> <title>Comments on Roderick Long's Article - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title> <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/rms-comment-longs-article.translist" --> <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --> <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" --> <!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE--> <!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" --> <div class="article reduced-width"> <h2>Comments on Roderick Long's Article</h2> <address class="byline">by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</a></address> <divclass="introduction"><p> Theclass="infobox"> <p>Richard Stallman states some points of disagreement with Roderick Long's article <a href="#long" id="long-rev"><sup>[1]</sup></a>.</p> </div> <div class="introduction"> <p>The ideas of the free software movement are compatible with social-democratic (US liberal) views and with laissez-faire (USlibertarian <a href="#ft1"><sup>[1]</sup></a>) views. </p></div>libertarian) views.</p> </div> <p>Free software is a matter of freedom. From our point of view, precisely which legalmechanism <sup><a href="#ft2">[2]</a></sup>mechanism <a href="#mechanism" id="mechanism-rev"><sup>[2]</sup></a> is used to deny software users their freedom is just an implementation detail. Whether it is done with copyright, with contracts, or in some other way, it is wrong to deny the public the freedoms necessary to form a community and cooperate. This is why it is inaccurate to understand the free software movement as specifically a matter of opposition to copyright on software. It is both more and less than that.</p> <p>However, you will often hear people of right-wing ideological persuasion argue in vague way that some general moral principle of property rights compels us to cede our freedom to a system of copyright, regardless of how this affects our way of life. The right-wing Libertarian counterargument, coming as it does from a group that regards property rights as the highest moral principle, is useful as a refutation. It shows that even if you adore property rights for physical objects, you are not compelled to accept copyright.</p> <div class="infobox"> <hr /><ol> <li id="ft1">Roderick T. Long, “The<p><a href="#long-rev" id="long">[1]</a><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20220325122805/http://freenation.org/a/f31l1.html"> <cite>The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual PropertyRights” at <a href="http://freenation.org/a/f31l1.html">freenation.org</a>, 1995.</li> <li id="ft2">…Rights</cite></a>. Roderick T. Long, 1995.</p> <p><a href="#mechanism-rev" id="mechanism">[2]</a>… or technical mechanism, such as withholding the source code, or <ahref="/philosophy/can-you-trust.html">tivoization</a>.</li> </ol>href="/philosophy/can-you-trust.html">tivoization</a>.</p> </div> </div> </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --> <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --> <div id="footer" role="contentinfo"> <div class="unprintable"> <p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><gnu@gnu.org></a>. There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>.</p> <p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph, replace it with the translation of these two: We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection. Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org"> <web-translators@gnu.org></a>.</p> <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of our web pages, see <a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a>. --> Please see the <a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a> for information on coordinating and contributing translations of this article.</p> </div> <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first. Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the document was modified, or published. If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too. Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system). There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --> <p>Copyright © 1996-2000, 2015,20212023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p> <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p> <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --> <p class="unprintable">Updated: <!-- timestamp start --> $Date: 2024/02/03 18:02:50 $ <!-- timestamp end --> </p> </div> </div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include --> </body> </html>