gnu-linux-faq.html - en to unknown language translation catalogue (188 entries)

note: type: Content of: <title>
en: GNU/Linux FAQ - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
target: ČPP o GNU/Linuxu - Projekt GNU - Zaklada za slobodan softver

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#whycare">Why is the name important?</a>
target: <a href="#whycare">Zašto je naziv važan?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#howerror">How did it come about that most people call the system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;?</a>
target: <a href="#howerror">Kako to da većina ljudi sustav zove &ldquo;Linuxom&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#always">Should we always say &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;?</a>
target: <a href="#always">Trebamo li uvijek reći &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; umjesto &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#linuxalone">Would Linux have achieved the same success if there had been no GNU?</a>
target: <a href="#linuxalone">Bi li Linux bio jednako uspješan da nije bilo GNU-a?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#divide">Wouldn't it be better for the community if you did not divide people with this request?</a>
target: <a href="#divide">Ne bi li bilo bolje za zajednicu da ne razdvajate ljude ovim zahtjevom?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#freespeech">Doesn't the GNU project support an individual's free speech rights to call the system by any name that individual chooses?</a>
target: <a href="#freespeech">Ne podržava li Projekt GNU pravo na slobodu govora u kojoj pojedinac može nazivati sustav kako god želi?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#everyoneknows">Since everyone knows the role of GNU in developing the system, doesn't the &ldquo;GNU/&rdquo; in the name go without saying?</a>
target: <a href="#everyoneknows">Kako svi znaju za ulogu GNU-a u razvoju sustava, nije li &ldquo;GNU/&rdquo; u nazivu podrazumijevano?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#everyoneknows2">Since I know the role of GNU in this system, why does it matter what name I use?</a>
target: <a href="#everyoneknows2">Kako ja znam ulogu GNU-a u sustavu, nije li nebitno koji naziv koristim?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#windows">Isn't shortening &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; to &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; just like shortening &ldquo;Microsoft Windows&rdquo; to &ldquo;Windows&rdquo;?</a>
target: <a href="#windows">Nije li kraćenje naziva &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; u &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; poput kraćenja naziva &ldquo;Microsoft Windows&rdquo; u &ldquo;Windows&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#tools">Isn't GNU a collection of programming tools that were included in Linux?</a>
target: <a href="#tools">Nije li GNU skup programerskih alata uključenih u Linux?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#osvskernel">What is the difference between an operating system and a kernel?</a>
target: <a href="#osvskernel">Koja je razlika između operativnog sustava i jezgre?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#house">The kernel of a system is like the foundation of a house.  How can a house be almost complete when it doesn't have a foundation?</a>
target: <a href="#house">Jezgra sustava je poput temelja kuće. Kako kuća može biti skoro završena ako nema temelje?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#brain">Isn't the kernel the brain of the system?</a>
target: <a href="#brain">Nije li jezgra mozak sustava?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#kernelmost">Isn't writing the kernel most of the work in an operating system?</a>
target: <a href="#kernelmost">Nije li pisanje jezgre najopsežniji posao u operativnom sustavu?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#afterkernel">We're calling the whole system after the kernel, Linux.  Isn't it normal to name an operating system after a kernel?</a>
target: <a href="#afterkernel">Cijeli sustav nazivamo prema jezgri, Linuxu. Nije li uobičajeno nazvati operativni sustav prema jezgri?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#long">The problem with &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; is that it is too long.  How about recommending a shorter name?</a>
target: <a href="#long">Problem s nazivom &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; jest da je predugačak.  A da predložite kraći naziv?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#long2">The problem with &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; is that it is too long.  Why should I go to the trouble of saying &ldquo;GNU/&rdquo;?</a>
target: <a href="#long2">Problem s nazivom &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; jest da je predugačak. Zašto bih se mučio izgovarajući &ldquo;GNU/&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#justgnu">Since Linux is a secondary contribution, would it be false to the facts to call the system simply &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;?</a>
target: <a href="#justgnu">S obzirom na to da je Linux tuđi doprinos, bi li bilo pogrešno nazivati sustav samo &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#many">Many other projects contributed to the system as it is today; it includes TeX, X11, Apache, Perl, and many more programs.  Don't your arguments imply we have to give them credit too? (But that would lead to a name so long it is absurd.)</a>
target: <a href="#many">Danas mnogi drugi projekti pridonose sustavu, uključujući TeX, X11, Apache, Perl i mnoge druge programe. Slijedeći vaše argumente, ne bismo li trebali i njima dati priznanje u nazivu? (No to bi dovelo do apsurdno dugačkog naziva.) </a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#others">Many other projects contributed to the system as it is today, but they don't insist on calling it XYZ/Linux.  Why should we treat GNU specially?</a>
target: <a href="#others">Danas mnogi drugi projekti pridonose sustavu, no oni ne inzistiraju na nazivu XYZ/Linux. Zašto bi GNU trebao imati drugačiji tretman?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#allsmall">GNU is a small fraction of the system nowadays, so why should we mention it?</a>
target: <a href="#allsmall">Danas je GNU samo mali dio sustava, zašto bismo ga trebali spominjati?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#manycompanies">Many companies contributed to the system as it is today; doesn't that mean we ought to call it GNU/Red&nbsp;Hat/Novell/Linux?</a>
target: <a href="#manycompanies">Danas mnoge tvrtke pridonose sustavu, ne znači li to da bismo ga trebali nazivati GNU/Red&nbsp;Hat/Novell/Linux?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#whyslash">Why do you write &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;GNU Linux&rdquo;?</a>
target: <a href="#whyslash">Zašto pišete &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; umjesto &ldquo;GNU Linux&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#whyorder">Why &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; rather than &ldquo;Linux/GNU&rdquo;?</a>
target: <a href="#whyorder"> Zašto &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;, a ne &ldquo;Linux/GNU&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#distronames">My distro is called &ldquo;Foobar Linux&rdquo;; doesn't that show it's really Linux?</a>
target: <a href="#distronames">Moja distribucija se zove &ldquo;Foobar Linux&rdquo;; ne pokazuje li to da je uistinu Linux?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#companies">Wouldn't it be more effective to ask companies such as Mandrake, Red Hat and IBM to call their distributions &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; rather than asking individuals?</a>
target: <a href="#companies">Ne bi li bilo efektnije tražiti tvrtke poput Mandrakea, Red Hata i IBM-a da nazivaju svoje distribucije &ldquo;GNU/Linuxom&rdquo; umjesto zahtijevanja toga od pojedinaca?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#reserve">Wouldn't it be better to reserve the name &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; for distributions that are purely free software? After all, that is the ideal of GNU.</a>
target: <a href="#reserve">Ne bi li bilo bolje sačuvati naziv &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; za distribucije koje su u potpunosti slobodan softver? Naposlijetku, to i jest ideal GNU-a.</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#gnudist">Why not make a GNU distribution of Linux (sic) and call that GNU/Linux?</a>
target: <a href="#gnudist">Zašto ne napravite GNU distribuciju Linuxa (sic) i ne nazovete ju GNU/Linux?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#linuxgnu">Why not just say &ldquo;Linux is the GNU kernel&rdquo; and release some existing version of GNU/Linux under the name &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;?</a>
target: <a href="#linuxgnu">Zašto jednostavno ne kažete da je &ldquo;Linux GNU-ova jezgra&rdquo; i ne izdate neke već postojeće verzije GNU/Linux-a pod imenom &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#condemn">Did the GNU Project condemn and oppose use of Linux in the early days?</a>
target: <a href="#condemn">Je li Projekt GNU osuđivao i protivio se upotrebi Linuxa u ranim danima?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#wait">Why did you wait so long before asking people to use the name GNU/Linux?</a>
target: <a href="#wait">Zašto ste čekali toliko vremena da zatražite od ljudi korištenje naziva GNU/Linux?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#unix">Since much of GNU comes from Unix, shouldn't GNU give credit to Unix by using &ldquo;Unix&rdquo; in its name?</a>
target: <a href="#unix">S obzirom na to da dobar dio GNU-a potječe iz Unixa, ne bi li GNU trebao odati priznanje Unixu koristeći &ldquo;Unix&rdquo; u nazivu?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#bsd">Should we say &ldquo;GNU/BSD&rdquo; too?</a>
target: <a href="#bsd">Trebamo li također govoriti &ldquo;GNU/BSD&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#othersys">If I install the GNU tools on Windows, does that mean I am running a GNU/Windows system?</a>
target: <a href="#othersys">Ako instaliram GNU-ove alate pod Windowsima, znači li to da imam sustav GNU/Windows?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#justlinux">Can't Linux be used without GNU?</a>
target: <a href="#justlinux">Ne može li se Linux upotrebljavati bez GNU-a?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#helplinus">Why not call the system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; anyway, and strengthen Linus Torvalds' role as posterboy for our community?</a>
target: <a href="#helplinus">Zašto ne zvati sustav &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; i ojačati ulogu Linusa Torvaldsa kao predstavnika zajednice?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#claimlinux">Isn't it wrong for us to label Linus Torvalds' work as GNU?</a>
target: <a href="#claimlinux">Nije li pogrešno označavati djelo Linusa Torvaldsa kao GNU?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#linusagreed">Does Linus Torvalds agree that Linux is just the kernel?</a>
target: <a href="#linusagreed">Slaže li se Linus Torvalds u označavanju Linuxa samo kao jezgre?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#lost">The battle is already lost&mdash;society has made its decision and we can't change it, so why even think about it?</a>
target: <a href="#lost">Bitka je već izgubljena&mdash;društvo je donijelo odluku koju ne možemo promijeniti, čemu uopće razmišljati o tome?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#whatgood">Society has made its decision and we can't change it, so what good does it do if I say &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;?</a>
target: <a href="#whatgood">Društvo je donijelo odluku koju ne možemo promijeniti, koju razliku čini ako ja kažem &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#explain">Wouldn't it be better to call the system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; and teach people its real origin with a ten-minute explanation?</a>
target: <a href="#explain">Ne bi li bilo bolje zvati sustav &ldquo;Linuxom&rdquo; i onda u nekoliko minuta objasniti ljudima njegovo porijeklo?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#treatment">Some people laugh at you when you ask them to call the system GNU/Linux.  Why do you subject yourself to this treatment?</a>
target: <a href="#treatment">Neki ljudi vam se smiju kada im kažete da bi sustav trebali zvati GNU/Linux. Zašto se sami podvrgavate ismijavanju?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#alienate">Some people condemn you when you ask them to call the system GNU/Linux.  Don't you lose by alienating them?</a>
target: <a href="#alienate">Neki ljudi vas osuđuju kada ih tražite da sustav zovu GNU/Linux. Ne gubite li njihovim otuđivanjem?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#rename">Whatever you contributed, is it legitimate to rename the operating system?</a>
target: <a href="#rename">Bez obzira na vaš doprinos, je li legitimno preimenovati operativni sustav?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#force">Isn't it wrong to force people to call the system &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;?</a>
target: <a href="#force">Nije li pogrešno prisiljavati ljude da sustav zovu &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#whynotsue">Why not sue people who call the whole system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;?</a>
target: <a href="#whynotsue">Zašto ne tužite ljude koji cijeli sustav zovu &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#BSDlicense">Since you objected to the original BSD license's advertising requirement to give credit to the University of California, isn't it hypocritical to demand credit for the GNU project?</a>
target: <a href="#BSDlicense">S obzirom na to da ste se protivili prvotnoj licenci BSD koja je tražila da se odaje priznanje Sveučilištu u Kaliforniji, nije li licemjerno zahtijevati priznanje za Projekt GNU?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#require">Shouldn't you put something in the GNU GPL to require people to call the system &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;?</a>
target: <a href="#require">Ne biste li trebali dodati nešto u GNU GPL čime bi ljudi bili primorani zvati sustav &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#contradict">Wouldn't you be better off not contradicting what so many people believe?</a>
target: <a href="#contradict">Ne bi li bilo bolje da ne proturječite onome što većina ljudi vjeruje?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><ul><li>
en: <a href="#winning">Many people care about what's convenient or who's winning, not about arguments of right or wrong.  Couldn't you get more of their support by a different road?</a>
target: <a href="#winning">Većina ljudi mari za ono što je prikladno ili tko pobjeđuje, a ne mare za rasprave o pravom ili krivom. Ne biste li imali više podrške da probate na drugačiji način?</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: Most operating system distributions based on Linux as kernel are basically modified versions of the GNU operating system.  We began developing GNU in 1984, years before Linus Torvalds started to write his kernel.  Our goal was to develop a complete free operating system.  Of course, we did not develop all the parts ourselves&mdash;but we led the way.  We developed most of the central components, forming the largest single contribution to the whole system.  The basic vision was ours too.
target: Većina distribucija operativnog sustava baziranog na Linuxu kao jezgri su u principu izmijenjene verzije operativnog sustava GNU. S razvojem GNU-a smo počeli 1984., godinama prije nego što je Linus Torvalds počeo pisati svoju jezgru. Naš cilj je bio razviti potpun slobodan operativni sustav. Naravno, nismo razvili sve dijelove sami&mdash;ali smo utrli put. Razvili smo većinu centralnih komponenti koje čine najveći jedinstveni doprinos cijelom sustavu. Osnovna vizija je također bila naša.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: In fairness, we ought to get at least equal mention.
target: Pošteno bi bilo da budemo barem jednako spomenuti.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: See <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">Linux and the GNU System</a> and <a href="/gnu/gnu-users-never-heard-of-gnu.html">GNU Users Who Have Never Heard of GNU</a> for more explanation, and <a href="/gnu/the-gnu-project.html">The GNU Project</a> for the history.
target: Vidi <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">Linux i sistem GNU</a> i <a href="/gnu/gnu-users-never-heard-of-gnu.html">GNU korisnici koji nisu nikada čuli za GNU</a>za detaljnije objašnjenje, te <a href="/gnu/the-gnu-project.html">Projekt GNU</a> za povijest.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Why is the name important? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#whycare">#whycare</a>)</span>
target: Zašto je naziv važan? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#whycare">#whycare</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: Although the developers of Linux, the kernel, are contributing to the free software community, many of them do not care about freedom.  People who think the whole system is Linux tend to get confused and assign to those developers a role in the history of our community which they did not actually play.  Then they give inordinate weight to those developers' views.
target: Iako većina razvijatelja Linuxa (jezgre) pridonosi zajednici slobodnog softvera, veliki broj njih ne mari za slobodu. Ljudi koji smatraju da je cijeli sustav Linux postanu zbunjeni, te tim razvijateljima dodijele uloge u povijesti naše zajednice koje ti razvijatelji nisu odigrali i njihovim pogledima dodaju preveliku težinu.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Calling the system GNU/Linux recognizes the role that our idealism played in building our community, and <a href="/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html">helps the public recognize the practical importance of these ideals</a>.
target: Nazivanje sustava GNU/Linux prepoznaje ulogu koju je imao naš idealizam pri stvaranju zajednice i <a href="/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html">pomaže javnosti da prepozna praktičnu važnost tih ideala</a>.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: How did it come about that most people call the system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#howerror">#howerror</a>)</span>
target: Kako to da većina ljudi sustav zove &ldquo;Linuxom&rdquo;?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#howerror">#howerror</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: Calling the system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; is a confusion that has spread faster than the corrective information.
target: Nazivanje sustava &ldquo;Linuxom&rdquo; jest zbunjenost koja se proširila brže od ispravne informacije.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The people who combined Linux with the GNU system were not aware that that's what their activity amounted to.  They focused their attention on the piece that was Linux and did not realize that more of the combination was GNU.  They started calling it &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; even though that name did not fit what they had.  It took a few years for us to realize what a problem this was and ask people to correct the practice.  By that time, the confusion had a big head start.
target: Ljudi koji su spojili Linux sa sustavom GNU nisu bili svjesni čime su njihove radnje rezultirale. Fokusirali su se na dio koji je bio Linux i nisu shvaćali da je većina spoja bila GNU. Počeli su sustav zvati &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; iako naziv nije odgovarao onome što su imali.  Trebalo nam je nekoliko godina da shvatimo kakav problem je to počelo predstavljati, te da zatražimo od ljudi da promijene naviku, no tada je zbunjenost već imala veliku prednost.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Many of the questions in this file represent people's attempts to justify the name they are accustomed to using.
target: Mnoga od pitanja u ovome tekstu predstavljaju načine na koje su ljudi pokušali opravdati naziv koji su navikli koristiti.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Should we always say &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#always">#always</a>)</span>
target: Trebamo li uvijek reći &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; umjesto &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#always">#always</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Would Linux have achieved the same success if there had been no GNU? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#linuxalone">#linuxalone</a>)</span>
target: Bi li Linux bio jednako uspješan da nije bilo GNU-a?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#linuxalone">#linuxalone</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: In that alternative world, there would be nothing today like the GNU/Linux system, and probably no free operating system at all.  No one attempted to develop a free operating system in the 1980s except the GNU Project and (later) Berkeley CSRG, which had been specifically asked by the GNU Project to start freeing its code.
target: U tom alternativnom svemiru danas ne bi postojalo ništa poput sustava GNU/Linux, i vjerojatno ne bi uopće postojao slobodan operativni sustav. Osamdesetih nitko nije pokušao razviti slobodan operativni sustav, izuzev Projekta GNU i (kasnije) i CSRG-a na Berkleyu (Grupa za istraživanje kompjuterskih sustava), koju je pak Projekt GNU zatražio da počne oslobađati svoj kod.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Linus Torvalds was partly influenced by a speech about GNU in Finland in 1990.  It's possible that even without this influence he might have written a Unix-like kernel, but it probably would not have been free software.  Linux became free in 1992 when Linus rereleased it under the GNU GPL.  (See the release notes for version 0.12.)
target: Linus Torvalds je djelomično bio pod utjecajem govora o GNU-u u Finskoj 1990. Moguće je da bi i bez ovog utjecaja napisao Unixoidnu jezgru, no vjerojatno ona ne bi bila slobodan softver. Linux je postao slobodan 1992. kada ga je Linus objavio pod licencom GNU GPL. (Vidi obavijesti uz izdanje za verziju 0.12.)

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Even if Torvalds had released Linux under some other free software license, a free kernel alone would not have made much difference to the world.  The significance of Linux came from fitting into a larger framework, a complete free operating system: GNU/Linux.
target: Čak i da je Torvalds objavio Linux pod nekom drugom slobodnom softverskom licencom, slobodna jezgra ne bi napravila neku veću razliku. Važnost Linuxa potječe iz njegovog uklapanja u veći okvir, potpuno slobodan operativni sustav: GNU/Linux.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Wouldn't it be better for the community if you did not divide people with this request? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#divide">#divide</a>)</span>
target: Ne bi li bilo bolje za zajednicu da ne razdvajate ljude ovim zahtjevom? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#divide">#divide</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: However, there are people who do not like our saying this.  Sometimes those people push us away in response.  On occasion they are so rude that one wonders if they are intentionally trying to intimidate us into silence.  It doesn't silence us, but it does tend to divide the community, so we hope you can convince them to stop.
target: Međutim, postoje neki kojima se ne sviđa to što govorimo. Ponekad nas zauzvrat čak i odbacuju. U nekim prilikama su i toliko nepristojni da se čovjek mora zapitati ne pokušavaju li nas oni namjerno zastrašiti kako bismo šutjeli. Nas to ne ušutkava, no dijeli zajednicu, te se nadamo da ih možete uvjeriti da prestanu.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: However, this is only a secondary cause of division in our community.  The largest division in the community is between people who appreciate free software as a social and ethical issue and consider proprietary software a social problem (supporters of the free software movement), and those who cite only practical benefits and present free software only as an efficient development model (the open source movement).
target: Međutim, ovo je samo jedan od razloga podjele u našoj zajednici. Najveća podjela postoji između ljudi koji smatraju slobodan softver društvenom i etičkom temom, a vlasnički softver smatraju društvenim problemom (tj. pristaše pokreta za slobodan softver), i onih koji navode samo praktične prednosti i predstavljaju slobodni softver samo kao efikasan razvojni model (tj. pokret za softver otvorenog koda).

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: This disagreement is not just a matter of names&mdash;it is a matter of differing basic values.  It is essential for the community to see and think about this disagreement.  The names &ldquo;free software&rdquo; and &ldquo;open source&rdquo; are the banners of the two positions.  See <a href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">Why Open Source misses the point of Free Software</a>.
target: Ovo neslaganje nije samo neslaganje u nazivu&mdash;ono je neslaganje u osnovnim vrijednostima. Važno je da zajednica dobro pogleda i razmisli o ovome neslaganju. Nazivi &ldquo;slobodan softver&rdquo; i &ldquo;otvoreni kod&rdquo; su barjaci dvaju strana. Vidi <a href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">Zašto otvoreni izvorni kod promašuje bit slobodnog softvera</a>.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Doesn't the GNU project support an individual's free speech rights to call the system by any name that individual chooses? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#freespeech">#freespeech</a>)</span>
target: Ne podržava li Projekt GNU pravo na slobodu govora u kojoj pojedinac može nazivati sustav kako god želi?  <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#freespeech">#freespeech</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Yes, indeed, we believe you have a free speech right to call the operating system by any name you wish.  We ask that people call it GNU/Linux as a matter of doing justice to the GNU project, to promote the values of freedom that GNU stands for, and to inform others that those values of freedom brought the system into existence.
target: Da, uistinu, smatramo da imate slobodu govora nazivati operativni sustav nazivom kojim poželite. No, mi tražimo da ga zovete GNU/Linux kako biste bili pravedni prema Projektu GNU, kako biste promovirali vrijednost slobode koja stoji iza GNU-a, te kako biste upoznali druge s tim vrijednostima slobode koje su iznjedrile ovaj sustav.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Since everyone knows the role of GNU in developing the system, doesn't the &ldquo;GNU/&rdquo; in the name go without saying? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#everyoneknows">#everyoneknows</a>)</span>
target: Kako svi znaju za ulogu GNU-a u razvoju sustava, nije li &ldquo;GNU/&rdquo; u nazivu podrazumijevano? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#everyoneknows">#everyoneknows</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The wording of this question, which is typical, illustrates another common misconception.  To speak of &ldquo;GNU's role&rdquo; in developing something assumes that GNU is a group of people.  GNU is an operating system.  It would make sense to talk about the GNU Project's role in this or some other activity, but not that of GNU.
target: Način na koji je (tipično) postavljeno ovo pitanje ocrtava čestu zabludu. Rasprava o  &ldquo;ulozi GNU-a&rdquo; u razvoju (nečega) pretpostavlja da je GNU skupina ljudi. GNU je operativni sustav. Bilo bi smisleno razgovarati o ulozi Projekta GNU u ovoj ili onoj aktivnosti, ali ne o ulozi GNU-a.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Since I know the role of GNU in this system, why does it matter what name I use? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#everyoneknows2">#everyoneknows2</a>)</span>
target: Kako ja znam ulogu GNU-a u sustavu, nije li nebitno koji naziv koristim? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#everyoneknows2">#everyoneknows2</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Isn't shortening &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; to &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; just like shortening &ldquo;Microsoft Windows&rdquo; to &ldquo;Windows&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#windows">#windows</a>)</span>
target: Nije li kraćenje naziva &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; u &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; poput kraćenja naziva &ldquo;Microsoft Windows&rdquo; u &ldquo;Windows&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#windows">#windows</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: It's useful to shorten a frequently-used name, but not if the abbreviation is misleading.
target: Jest korisno pokratiti često korišten naziv, ali ne ukoliko skraćenica zavarava.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Almost everyone in developed countries really does know that the &ldquo;Windows&rdquo; system is made by Microsoft, so shortening &ldquo;Microsoft Windows&rdquo; to &ldquo;Windows&rdquo; does not mislead anyone as to that system's nature and origin.  Shortening &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; to &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; does give the wrong idea of where the system comes from.
target: Većina u razvijenim zemljama uistinu zna da je Microsoft razvio &ldquo;Windowse&rdquo;, stoga kraćenje naziva &ldquo;Microsoft Windows&rdquo; u &ldquo;Windows&rdquo; ne zavarava nikoga o porijeklu i prirodi tog sustava. Kraćenje naziva &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; u &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; daje krive informacije o porijeklu sustava.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The question is itself misleading because GNU and Microsoft are not the same kind of thing.  Microsoft is a company; GNU is an operating system.
target: Čak i samo pitanje je pogrešno zato što GNU i Microsoft nisu ista stvar. Microsoft je tvrtka, GNU je operativni sustav.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Isn't GNU a collection of programming tools that were included in Linux? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#tools">#tools</a>)</span>
target:  Nije li GNU skup programerskih alata uključenih u Linux?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#tools">#tools</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The GNU Project was named after the GNU operating system&mdash;it's the project to develop the GNU system.  (See <a href="/gnu/initial-announcement.html">the 1983 initial announcement</a>.)
target: Projekt GNU je dobio ime po operativnom sustavu GNU&mdash;to je projekt koji razvija sustav GNU. (Vidi <a href="/gnu/initial-announcement.html">Prvotna najava 1983.</a>.)

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: We developed programs such as GCC, GNU Emacs, GAS, GLIBC, BASH, etc., because we needed them for the GNU operating system.  GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection is the compiler that we wrote for the GNU operating system.  We, the many people working on the GNU Project, developed Ghostscript, GNUCash, GNU Chess and GNOME for the GNU system too.
target: Razvili smo programe poput GCC-a, GNU Emacsa, GAS-a, GLIB-a, BASH-a itd. jer su nam bili potrebni za operativni sustav GNU. GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection (skup alata za prevođenje) jest prevoditelj kojega smo napisali za operativni sustav GNU. Mi, ljudi koji radimo u Projektu GNU, za sustav GNU smo razvili i Ghostscript, GNUCash, GNU Chess i GNOME za sustav GNU.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: What is the difference between an operating system and a kernel? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#osvskernel">#osvskernel</a>)</span>
target: Koja je razlika između operativnog sustava i jezgre?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#osvskernel">#osvskernel</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: An operating system, as we use the term, means a collection of programs that are sufficient to use the computer to do a wide variety of jobs.  A general purpose operating system, to be complete, ought to handle all the jobs that many users may want to do.
target: Operativni sustav, kako ga mi označavamo, označava zbir programa koji su dostatni da bi računalo obavilo razne zadatke. Operativni sustav opće namjene bi trebao moći obaviti sve poslove koje korisnici žele.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The kernel is one of the programs in an operating system&mdash;the program that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that are running.  The kernel also takes care of starting and stopping other programs.
target: Jezgra je jedan od programa u operativnom sustavu&mdash;program koji dodjeljuje resurse računala drugim aktivnim programima. Jezgra se također brine o pokretanju i zaustavljanju drugih programa.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: The kernel of a system is like the foundation of a house.  How can a house be almost complete when it doesn't have a foundation? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#house">#house</a>)</span>
target: Jezgra sustava je poput temelja kuće. Kako kuća može biti skoro završena ako nema temelje?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#house">#house</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: A kernel is not much like the foundation of a house because building an operating system is not much like building a house.
target: Ne može se za jezgru reći da je slična temeljima kuće zato jer izgradnja operativnog sustava nije baš slična gradnji kuće.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: A house is built from lots of little general parts that are cut and put together in situ.  They have to be put together from the bottom up.  Thus, when the foundation has not been built, no substantial part has been built; all you have is a hole in the ground.
target: Kuća se gradi od mnoštva dijelova koja se obrađuju i sastavljaju zajedno na željenom mjestu. Moraju se sagraditi od temelja prema naviše. Stoga ako temelj nije izgrađen sve što imate jest rupa u zemlji.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: By contrast, an operating system consists of complex components that can be developed in any order.  When you have developed most of the components, most of the work is done.  This is much more like the International Space Station than like a house.  If most of the Space Station modules were in orbit but awaiting one other essential module, that would be like the GNU system in 1992.
target: Nasuprot tome, operativni sustav se sastoji od kompleksnih komponenti koje se mogu razviti bez posebnog redoslijeda. Kad razvijete većinu komponenti, većina posla je i završena. To je sličnije izgradnji međunarodne svemirske postaje nego kuće. Da je većina modula ISS-a u orbiti u iščekivanju jednog važnog modula, bila bi to situacija poput one u kojoj se nalazio sustav GNU 1992.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Isn't the kernel the brain of the system? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#brain">#brain</a>)</span>
target: Nije li jezgra mozak sustava?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#brain">#brain</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: A computer system is not much like a human body, and no part of it plays a role comparable to that of the brain in a human.
target: Računalni sustav nije baš sličan ljudskom tijelu, ni jedan dio nema ulogu koja bi odgovarala ljudskom mozgu.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Isn't writing the kernel most of the work in an operating system? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#kernelmost">#kernelmost</a>)</span>
target: Nije li pisanje jezgre najopsežniji posao u operativnom sustavu?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#kernelmost">#kernelmost</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: No, many components take a lot of work.
target: Ne, mnoge komponente zahtijevaju mnogo truda.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: We're calling the whole system after the kernel, Linux.  Isn't it normal to name an operating system after a kernel? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#afterkernel">#afterkernel</a>)</span>
target: Cijeli sustav nazivamo prema jezgri, Linuxu. Nije li uobičajeno nazvati operativni sustav prema jezgri?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#afterkernel">#afterkernel</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Because those two constructions are used synonymously, the expression &ldquo;the Linux kernel&rdquo; can easily be misunderstood as meaning &ldquo;the kernel of Linux&rdquo; and implying that Linux must be more than a kernel.  You can avoid the possibility of this misunderstanding by saying or writing &ldquo;the kernel, Linux&rdquo; or &ldquo;Linux, the kernel.&rdquo;
target: Zbog toga što se te dvije konstrukcije upotrebljavaju kao sinonimi, izraz &ldquo;jezgra Linux&rdquo; se može krivo protumačiti kao &ldquo;jezgra Linuxa; i implicirati da je Linux nešto više od jezgre. Mogućnosti nesporazuma se izbjegavaju ukoliko se koriste termini &ldquo;jezgra, Linux&rdquo; ili &ldquo;Linux, jezgra.&rdquo;

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: The problem with &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; is that it is too long.  How about recommending a shorter name? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#long">#long</a>)</span>
target: Problem s nazivom &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; jest da je predugačak.  A da predložite kraći naziv?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#long">#long</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: The problem with &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; is that it is too long.  Why should I go to the trouble of saying &ldquo;GNU/&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#long2">#long2</a>)</span>
target: Problem s nazivom &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; jest da je predugačak. Zašto bih se mučio izgovarajući &ldquo;GNU/&rdquo;?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#long2">#long2</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Since Linux is a secondary contribution, would it be false to the facts to call the system simply &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#justgnu">#justgnu</a>)</span>
target: S obzirom na to da je Linux tuđi doprinos, bi li bilo pogrešno nazivati sustav samo &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#justgnu">#justgnu</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: It would not be false to the facts, but it is not the best thing to do.  Here are the reasons we call that system version &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; rather than just &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;:
target: To ne bi bilo netočno ali nije baš najzgodnije. Ovdje ćemo izložiti zašto koristimo naziv &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; radije nego samo &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><ul><li>
en: It's not exactly GNU&mdash;it has a different kernel (that is, Linux).  Distinguishing GNU/Linux from GNU is useful.
target: Sustav nije samo GNU&mdash;sadrži drugu jezgru. Razlikovanje GNU/Linuxa od GNU-a je korisno.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><ul><li>
en: It would be ungentlemanly to ask people to <em>stop</em> giving any credit to Linus Torvalds.  He did write an important component of the system.  We want to get credit for launching and sustaining the system's development, but this doesn't mean we should treat Linus the same way those who call the system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; treat us.  We strongly disagree with his political views, but we deal with that disagreement honorably and openly, rather than by trying to cut him out of the credit for his contribution to the system.
target: Ne bi bilo korektno tražiti ljude da <em>prestanu</em> davati priznanje Linusu Torvaldu. Ipak je napisao bitnu komponentu sustava. Mi želimo zasluge za izdavanje i održavanje sistemskog razvoja ali to ne znači da ćemo tretirati Linusa na isti način kao što nas tretiraju oni što sustav nazivaju &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;. Snažno se protivimo njegovim političkim svjetonazorima ali na častan način i ne želimo mu ukrasti zasluge koje se tiču njegovog doprinosa sustavu.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: There's nothing wrong in calling the system &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;; basically, that's what it is.  It is nice to give Linus Torvalds a share of the credit as well, but you have no obligation to pay for the privilege of doing so.
target: Nije pogrešno nazvati sustav &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;, jer u biti, to on i jest. Lijepo je i priznati zasluge Linusa, međutim, na ovaj način vi nemate nikakve obveze plaćati tu privilegiju.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Many other projects contributed to the system as it is today; it includes TeX, X11, Apache, Perl, and many more programs.  Don't your arguments imply we have to give them credit too? (But that would lead to a name so long it is absurd.) <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#many">#many</a>)</span>
target: Danas mnogi drugi projekti pridonose sustavu, uključujući TeX, X11, Apache, Perl i mnoge druge programe. Slijedeći vaše argumente, ne bismo li trebali i njima dati priznanje u nazivu? (No to bi dovelo do apsurdno dugačkog naziva.)<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#many">#many</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: What we say is that you ought to give the system's principal developer a share of the credit.  The principal developer is the GNU Project, and the system is basically GNU.
target: Ono što želimo reći jest da bi se trebale priznati zasluge glavnim razvijateljima sustava. Glavni razvijatelj je Projekt GNU i sustav je u osnovi GNU.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: If you feel even more strongly about giving credit where it is due, you might feel that some secondary contributors also deserve credit in the system's name.  If so, far be it from us to argue against it.  If you feel that X11 deserves credit in the system's name, and you want to call the system GNU/X11/Linux, please do.  If you feel that Perl simply cries out for mention, and you want to write GNU/Linux/Perl, go ahead.
target: Ako možda želite naglasiti zasluge i nekih drugih, sekundarnih, suradnika u razvoju sustava, nećemo vas sprječavati. Ako mislite da se X11 trebaju priznati zasluge, slobodno nazovite sustav GNU/X11/Linux. Ako smatrate da baš treba spomenuti i Perl, slobodno pišite i GNU/Linux/Perl.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Since a long name such as GNU/X11/Apache/Linux/TeX/Perl/Python/FreeCiv becomes absurd, at some point you will have to set a threshold and omit the names of the many other secondary contributions.  There is no one obvious right place to set the threshold, so wherever you set it, we won't argue against it.
target: Međutim, pošto su duga imena poput GNU/X11/Apache/Linux/TeX/Perl/Python/FreeCiv apsurdna, treba odrediti određenu točku ili granicu po vlastitom nahođenju u kojoj će se izostaviti nazivi mnogih drugih suradnika. Kako ne postoji očito mjesto gdje bi granica trebala biti, postavite ju gdje god želite, bez prigovora

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Many other projects contributed to the system as it is today, but they don't insist on calling it XYZ/Linux.  Why should we treat GNU specially? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#others">#others</a>)</span>
target: Danas mnogi drugi projekti pridonose sustavu, no oni ne inzistiraju na nazivu XYZ/Linux. Zašto bi GNU trebao imati drugačiji tretman?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#others">#others</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: Thousands of projects have developed programs commonly included in today's GNU/Linux systems.  They all deserve credit for their contributions, but they aren't the principal developers of the system as a whole, so they don't ask to be credited as such.
target: Kao rezultat tisuća projekata nastali su programi koji su danas obično uključeni u sustave GNU/Linux. Svi oni zaslužuju određeno priznanje za svoj doprinos, ali oni nisu glavni razvijatelji sustava kao cjeline i zato ni ne traže priznanje na takav način.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: GNU is different because it is more than just a contributed program, more than just a collection of contributed programs.  GNU is the framework on which the system was made.
target: GNU je drugačiji zato jer je on više od programa ili zbira programa. GNU je okvir na temelju kojeg je sustav napravljen.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: GNU is a small fraction of the system nowadays, so why should we mention it? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#allsmall">#allsmall</a>)</span>
target: Danas je GNU samo mali dio sustava, zašto bismo ga trebali spominjati?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#allsmall">#allsmall</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: GNU is a small fraction of the system nowadays, and Linux is an even smaller fraction.  But they are the system's core; the system was made by combining them.  Thus, the name &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; remains appropriate.
target: GNU predstavlja danas samo djelić sustava, dok Linux predstavlja još manji. Ali oni su temeljni dio sustava, sustav je napravljen njihovom kombinacijom. Stoga, naziv &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; je prikladan.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Many companies contributed to the system as it is today; doesn't that mean we ought to call it GNU/Red&nbsp;Hat/Novell/Linux? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#manycompanies">#manycompanies</a>)</span>
target: Danas mnoge tvrtke pridonose sustavu, ne znači li to da bismo ga trebali nazivati GNU/Red&nbsp;Hat/Novell/Linux? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#manycompanies">#manycompanies</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: GNU is not comparable to Red Hat or Novell; it is not a company, or an organization, or even an activity.  GNU is an operating system.  (When we speak of the GNU Project, that refers to the project to develop the GNU system.)  The GNU/Linux system is based on GNU, and that's why GNU ought to appear in its name.
target: GNU nije usporediv sa Red Hatom ili Novellom, nije tvrtka niti organizacija, niti čak aktivnost. GNU je operativni sustav. (Kada govorimo o Projektu GNU, to označava projekt koji razvija sustav GNU). Sustav GNU/Linux je baziran na GNU-u i zato se GNU treba nalaziti u nazivu.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Much of those companies' contribution to the GNU/Linux system lies in the code they have contributed to various GNU packages including GCC and GNOME.  Saying GNU/Linux gives credit to those companies along with all the rest of the GNU developers.
target: Veliki dio doprinosa tih tvrtki sustavu GNU/Linux su kodovi koji se nalaze u raznim GNU paketima uključujući GCC i GNOME. Naziv GNU/Linux odaje priznanje tim tvrtkama, kao i ostalim razvijateljima GNU-a.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Why do you write &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;GNU Linux&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#whyslash">#whyslash</a>)</span>
target: Zašto pišete &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; umjesto &ldquo;GNU Linux&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#whyslash">#whyslash</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Linux is not a GNU package; that is, it wasn't developed under the GNU Project's aegis or contributed specifically to the GNU Project.  Linus Torvalds wrote Linux independently, as his own project.  So the &ldquo;Linux, which is a GNU package&rdquo; meaning is not right.
target: Linux nije paket GNU-a, tj. nije razvijen pod okriljem Projekta GNU, niti je dao doprinos Projektu GNU. Linus Torvalds je napisao Linux nezavisno, kao vlastiti projekt. Tako da &ldquo;Linux, koji je paket GNU-a&rdquo; nije ispravno značenje.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Why &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; rather than &ldquo;Linux/GNU&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#whyorder">#whyorder</a>)</span>
target: Zašto &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;, a ne &ldquo;Linux/GNU&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#whyorder">#whyorder</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: It is right and proper to mention the principal contribution first.  The GNU contribution to the system is not only bigger than Linux and prior to Linux, we actually started the whole activity.
target: Ispravno i prikladno bi bilo spomenuti glavni doprinos prvo. Doprinos GNU-a sustavu nije samo veći od Linuxa već smo i započeli cijelu tu aktivnost prije Linuxa.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: My distro is called &ldquo;Foobar Linux&rdquo;; doesn't that show it's really Linux? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#distronames">#distronames</a>)</span>
target: Moja distribucija se zove &ldquo;Foobar Linux&rdquo;; ne pokazuje li to da je uistinu Linux? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#distronames">#distronames</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: It means that the people who make the &ldquo;Foobar Linux&rdquo; distro are repeating the common mistake. We appreciate that distributions like Debian, Dragora, Musix, Trisquel, and Venenux have adopted GNU/Linux as part of their official name, and we hope that if you are involved with a different distribution, you will encourage it to do the same.
target: To znači da ljudi koji razvijaju distribuciju &ldquo;Foobar Linux&rdquo; ponavljaju uobičajenu grešku. Mi cijenimo što su distribucije poput Debiana, Dragore, Musixa, Trisquela i Venenuxa prisvojili GNU/Linux kao dio svog službenog imena i nadamo se da ćete, ako sudjelujete u razvoju drugih distribucija, učiniti isto.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Wouldn't it be more effective to ask companies such as Mandrake, Red Hat and IBM to call their distributions &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; rather than asking individuals? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#companies">#companies</a>)</span>
target: Ne bi li bilo efektnije tražiti tvrtke poput Mandrakea, Red Hata i IBM-a da nazivaju svoje distribucije &ldquo;GNU/Linuxom&rdquo; umjesto zahtijevanja toga od pojedinaca? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#companies">#companies</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: It isn't a choice of one or the other&mdash;we ask companies and organizations and individuals to help spread the word about this.  In fact, we have asked all three of those companies.  Mandrake said it would use the term &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; some of the time, but IBM and Red Hat were unwilling to help.  One executive said, &ldquo;This is a pure commercial decision; we expect to make more money calling it &lsquo;Linux&rsquo;.&rdquo; In other words, that company did not care what was right.
target: Nije to pitanje izbora jednog ili drugoga&mdash;mi molimo tvrtke i organizacije te individue da pomognu u širenju ove činjenice. Štoviše, razgovarali smo sa sve tri navedene tvrtke. Mandrake je rekao da će koristiti naziv &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; neko vrijeme, ali IBM i Red Hat nisu bili spremni pomoći. Jedna od izvršnih osoba je rekla: &ldquo;To je čisto komercijalna odluka, očekujemo veću zaradu uz naziv &lsquo;Linux&rsquo;.&rdquo; Drugim riječima, nije ih briga što je ispravno.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Wouldn't it be better to reserve the name &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; for distributions that are purely free software? After all, that is the ideal of GNU. <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#reserve">#reserve</a>)</span>
target: Ne bi li bilo bolje sačuvati naziv &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; za distribucije koje su u potpunosti slobodan softver? Naposlijetku, to i jest ideal GNU-a. <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#reserve">#reserve</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The question is how to try to change this.
target: Postavlja se pitanje kako to promjeniti.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Given that most of the community which uses GNU with Linux already does not realize that's what it is, for us to disown these adulterated versions, saying they are not really GNU, would not teach the users to value freedom more.  They would not get the intended message.  They would only respond they never thought these systems were GNU in the first place.
target: S obzirom da većina zajednice korisnika GNU s Linuxom ne shvaća da je to ono što u biti jest, odricanje i osuđivanje takvih verzija s naše strane ne bi prozvelo traženi učinak. Ne bi poučilo korisnike da cijene slobodu više. Ne bi primili željenu poruku. Jedino bi odgovorili da uopće nisu ni smatrali da su ti sustavi GNU

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: It is very useful to start GNU/Linux User Groups, which call the system GNU/Linux and adopt the ideals of the GNU Project as a basis for their activities.  If the Linux User Group in your area has the problems described above, we suggest you either campaign within the group to change its orientation (and name) or start a new group.  The people who focus on the more superficial goals have a right to their views, but don't let them drag you along!
target: Korisno bi bilo pokrenuti korisničke grupe uz GNU/Linux, koje će zvati sustav GNU/Linux i promicati ideale GNU Projekta kao temelj svojih aktivnosti. Ako koja Linuxova korisnièka grupa ima gore navedene probleme, mi predlažemo pokretanje kampanje unutar same grupe s ciljem promjene smjera te naziva grupe. Korisnici sa površnim pogledom na situaciju imaju pravo na svoje mišljenje ali ne dajte da vas povuku sa sobom!

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Why not make a GNU distribution of Linux (sic) and call that GNU/Linux? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#gnudist">#gnudist</a>)</span>
target: Zašto ne napravite GNU distribuciju Linuxa (sic) i ne nazovete ju GNU/Linux? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#gnudist">#gnudist</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: All the &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; distributions are actually versions of the GNU system with Linux as the kernel.  The purpose of the term &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; is to communicate this point.  To develop one new distribution and call that alone &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; would obscure the point we want to make.
target: Sve distribucije &ldquo;Linuxa&rdquo; su zapravo verzije sustava GNU sa Linuxom kao jezgrom. Svrha naziva&ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; je ukazati na tu činjenicu. Razviti jednu novu distribuciju i samo nju nazvati &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; bi prikrilo našu poantu.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: As for developing a distribution of GNU/Linux, we already did this once, when we funded the early development of Debian GNU/Linux.  To do it again now does not seem useful; it would be a lot of work, and unless the new distribution had substantial practical advantages over other distributions, it would serve no purpose.
target: Što se tiče razvoja distribucije GNU/Linux, već smo to i napravili kad smo uložili u rani razvoj distribucije GNU/Linuxa Debian. Učiniti to ponovo se ne čini korisnim, uz to što to znači i jako puno posla i osim ako ne bi imala znatne praktične prednosti nad ostalim distribucijama, ne bi služilo nikakvoj svrsi

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Why not just say &ldquo;Linux is the GNU kernel&rdquo; and release some existing version of GNU/Linux under the name &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#linuxgnu">#linuxgnu</a>)</span>
target: Zašto jednostavno ne kažete da je &ldquo;Linux GNU-ova jezgra&rdquo; i ne izdate neke već postojeće verzije GNU/Linux-a pod imenom &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#linuxgnu">#linuxgnu</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: It might have been a good idea to adopt Linux as the GNU kernel back in 1992.  If we had realized, then, how long it would take to get the GNU Hurd to work, we might have done that.  (Alas, that is hindsight.)
target: Možda bi i bila dobra ideja da smo usvojili Linux kao GNU-ovu jezgru još tamo 1992. godine. Da smo onda shvaćali koliko će dugo trebati da GNU Hurd proradi, možda bismo to i učinili.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Did the GNU Project condemn and oppose use of Linux in the early days? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#condemn">#condemn</a>)</span>
target: e li Projekt GNU osuđivao i protivio se upotrebi Linuxa u ranim danima? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#condemn">#condemn</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: We did not adopt Linux as our kernel, but we didn't condemn or oppose it.  In 1993 we started discussing the arrangements to sponsor the development of Debian GNU/Linux.  We also sought to cooperate with the people who were changing some GNU packages for use with Linux.  We wanted to include their changes in the standard releases so that these GNU packages would work out-of-the-box in combination with Linux.  But the changes were often ad-hoc and nonportable; they needed to be cleaned up for installation.
target: Nismo prihvatili Linux kao našu jezgru, ali nismo to niti osudili ili se protivili. 1993. godine smo počeli raspravu o sponzorstvu razvoja GNU/Linuxa Debian. Također smo težili suradnji s ljudima koji su mijenjali neke pakete GNU-a za upotrebu s Linuxom. Željeli smo uključiti njihove promjene u standardna izdanja tako da bi ti paketi GNU-a radili bez problema u kombinaciji s Linuxom. Ali izmjene su često bile ad-hoc i neportabilne, trebalo ih je "pročistiti" za instalaciju.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Why did you wait so long before asking people to use the name GNU/Linux? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#wait">#wait</a>)</span>
target: Zašto ste čekali toliko vremena da zatražite od ljudi korištenje naziva GNU/Linux? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#wait">#wait</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Actually we didn't.  We began talking privately with developers and distributors about this in 1994, and made a more public campaign in 1996.  We will continue for as long as it's necessary.
target: Zapravo i nismo. Počeli smo privatno razgovarati sa razvijateljima i distributerima o ovome još 1994. i počeli smo javnu kampanju 1996. godine. Nastaviti ćemo koliko god je potrebno.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Should the GNU/<i>name</i> convention be applied to all programs that are GPL'ed? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#allgpled">#allgpled</a>)</span>
target: Bi li se pravilo o nazivu GNU/[naziv] trebalo slijediti u svim programima koji su pod licencom GPL? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#allgpled">#allgpled</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: GNU, the operating system, is made up of many different programs.  Some of the programs in GNU were written as part of the GNU Project or specifically contributed to it; these are the GNU packages, and we often use &ldquo;GNU&rdquo; in their names.
target: GNU, operativni sustav, sastavljen je od brojnih programa. Neki od programa u GNU su napisani u sklopu Projekta GNU ili su mu izravno doprinijeli; to su GNU-ovi paketi, i u njihovim nazivima često koristimo koristimo &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: It's up to the developers of a program to decide if they want to contribute it and make it a GNU package.  If you have developed a program and you would like it to be a GNU package, please write to <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>, so we can evaluate it and decide whether we want it.
target: Na razvijateljima programa je da odluče žele li doprinositi i pretvoriti ga u GNU-ov paket. Ukoliko ste razvili program i htjeli biste da bude GNU-ov paket, molimo vas, pišite nam na <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>, kako bismo ga mogli procijeniti i eventualno prihvatiti.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: It wouldn't be fair to put the name GNU on every individual program that is released under the GPL.  If you write a program and release it under the GPL, that doesn't mean the GNU Project wrote it or that you wrote it for us.  For instance, the kernel, Linux, is released under the GNU GPL, but Linus did not write it as part of the GNU Project&mdash;he did the work independently.  If something is not a GNU package, the GNU Project can't take credit for it, and putting &ldquo;GNU&rdquo; in its name would be improper.
target: Ne bi bilo pošteno staviti naziv GNU ispred svakog pojedinog programa koji je objavljen pod licencom GPL. Ukoliko ste napisali program i objavili ga pod licencom GPL, to ne znači da je to djelo Projekta GNU ili da ste ga napisali za nas. Na primjer, jezgra, Linux, je objavljena pod licencom GNU GPL, ali Linus ju nije napisao kao dio Projekta GNU&mdash;radio je samostalno. Ukoliko nešto nije GNU-ov paket, Projekt GNU si ne može pripisati zasluge za to, i dodavanje nazivu &ldquo;GNU&rdquo; ne bi bilo u redu.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: In contrast, we do deserve the overall credit for the GNU operating system as a whole, even though not for each and every program in it.  The system exists as a system because of our determination and persistence, starting in 1984, many years before Linux was begun.
target: S druge strane, zaslužujemo da nam se priznaju zasluge za operativni sustav GNU, no ne i za svaki pojedini program u njegovom sastavu. Sustav postoji kao sastav zbog naše odlučnosti i upornosti koja počinje 1984., mnogo prije nego što je rad na Linuxu započet.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The operating system in which Linux became popular was basically the same as the GNU operating system.  It was not entirely the same, because it had a different kernel, but it was mostly the same system.  It was a variant of GNU.  It was the GNU/Linux system.
target: Operativni sustav kroz koji se Linux popularizirao je u osnovi bio sličan operativnom sustavu GNU. Nije bio u potpunosti isti, imao je drugu jezgru, no većinom je bio isti sustav - varijanta GNU-a. Bio je sustav GNU/Linux.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Linux continues to be used primarily in derivatives of that system&mdash;in today's versions of the GNU/Linux system.  What gives these systems their identity is GNU and Linux at the center of them, not particularly Linux alone.
target: Linux se prvenstveno nastavlja koristiti u derivativima tog sistema&mdash;u današnjim verzijama sustava GNU/Linux. Ono što daje "osobnost" tim sustavima su GNU i Linux u njihovoj biti, a ne sam Linux.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Since much of GNU comes from Unix, shouldn't GNU give credit to Unix by using &ldquo;Unix&rdquo; in its name? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#unix">#unix</a>)</span>
target: S obzirom na to da dobar dio GNU-a potječe iz Unixa, ne bi li GNU trebao odati priznanje Unixu koristeći &ldquo;Unix&rdquo; u nazivu? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#unix">#unix</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: Actually, none of GNU comes from Unix.  Unix was proprietary software (and still is), so using any of its code in GNU would have been illegal.  This is not a coincidence; this is why we developed GNU: since you could not have freedom in using Unix, or any of the other operating systems of the day, we needed a free system to replace it.  We could not copy programs, or even parts of them, from Unix; everything had to be written afresh.
target: Zapravo, ništa od GNU-a ne potječe iz Unixa. Unix je bio (i još jest) vlasnički softver, pa korištenje njegova izvornog koda u GNU-u bi bilo ilegalno. Ovo nije slučajnost; to je razlog zašto smo i razvili GNU: kako korištenjem Unixa ne biste imali slobodu, a niti korištenjem ijednog od današnjih operativnih sustava, bio je potreban slobodan sustav koji bi ih zamijenio. Iz Unixa nismo mogli kopirati niti programe niti niti njegove dijelove, sve je moralo biti pisano iznova.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Should we say &ldquo;GNU/BSD&rdquo; too? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#bsd">#bsd</a>)</span>
target: Trebamo li također govoriti &ldquo;GNU/BSD&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#bsd">#bsd</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: We don't call the BSD systems (FreeBSD, etc.) &ldquo;GNU/BSD&rdquo; systems, because that term does not fit the history of the BSD systems.
target: Sustave BSD (npr. FreeBSD) ne nazivamo sustavima  &ldquo;GNU/BSD&rdquo; jer taj naziv ne odgovara povijesti sustava BSD.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: People sometimes ask whether BSD too is a variant of GNU, as GNU/Linux is.  It is not.  The BSD developers were inspired to make their code free software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU activists helped convince them to start, but the code had little overlap with GNU.
target: Ljudi ponekad pitaju je li BSD također inačica GNU-a, poput GNU/Linuxa. On to nije. Razvijatelje BSD-a je inspirirao primjer Projekta GNU za oslobađanje koda, a pozivi GNU-ovih aktivista su im pomogli da se odluče to i učiniti; no sam kod ima malo dodirnih točaka s GNU-om.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: BSD systems today use some GNU packages, just as the GNU system and its variants use some BSD programs; however, taken as wholes, they are two different systems that evolved separately.  The BSD developers did not write a kernel and add it to the GNU system, so a name like GNU/BSD would not fit the situation.
target: Sustavi BSD danas koriste neke od GNU-ovih paketa, kao što i GNU koristi neke od BSD-ovih programa, no gledano u cjelini, to su dva različita sustava s različitim nastankom. Razvijatelji BSD-a nisu napisali jezgru i dodali ju u sustav GNU, stoga naziv GNU/BSD ne odgovara stanju stvari.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The connection between GNU/Linux and GNU is much closer, and that's why the name &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; is appropriate for it.
target: Veza između GNU/Linuxa i GNU-a je mnogo čvršća, i zato je naziv &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; ispravan.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: If I install the GNU tools on Windows, does that mean I am running a GNU/Windows system? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#othersys">#othersys</a>)</span>
target: Ako instaliram GNU-ove alate pod Windowsima, znači li to da imam sustav GNU/Windows? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#othersys">#othersys</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Can't Linux be used without GNU? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#justlinux">#justlinux</a>)</span>
target: Ne može li se Linux upotrebljavati bez GNU-a? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#justlinux">#justlinux</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Linux is used by itself, or with small other programs, in some appliances.  These small software systems are a far cry from the GNU/Linux system.  Users do not install them on PCs, for instance, and would find them rather disappointing.  It is useful to say that these appliances run just Linux, to show how different those small platforms are from GNU/Linux.
target: Linux se koristi sam (uz neke druge manje programe) u bijeloj i sivoj tehnici. Ovi mali softverski sustavi su različita priča od sustava GNU/Linux. Korisnici ih ne mogu instalirati na računala (kada bi i mogli, ostali bi razočarani). Korisno je naglasiti da tu tehniku pokreće sami Linux, kako bi se pokazala razlika između tih malih platformi i GNU/Linuxa.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Why not call the system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; anyway, and strengthen Linus Torvalds' role as posterboy for our community? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#helplinus">#helplinus</a>)</span>
target: Zašto ne zvati sustav &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; i ojačati ulogu Linusa Torvaldsa kao predstavnika zajednice? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#helplinus">#helplinus</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: Linus Torvalds is the &ldquo;posterboy&rdquo; (other people's choice of word, not ours) for his goals, not ours.  His goal is to make the system more popular, and he believes its value to society lies merely in the practical advantages it offers: its power, reliability and easy availability.  He has never advocated <a href="/philosophy/why-free.html">freedom to cooperate</a> as an ethical principle, which is why the public does not connect the name &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; with that principle.
target: Linus Torvalds jest &ldquo;predstavnik zajednice&rdquo; (tuđe riječi, ne naše) zbog svojih osobnih ciljeva, ne naših. Njegov cilj je popularizacija sustava, i smatra da vrijednost sustava leži u praktičnim stvarima koje on nudi: snazi, pouzdanosti i dostupnosti. Nikada nije zastupao <a href="/philosophy/why-free.html">slobodu suradnje</a> kao etički princip, i stoga javnost naziv &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; ne povezuje s tim principom.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: There is nothing wrong with writing a free program for the motivations of learning and having fun; the kernel Linus wrote for those reasons was an important contribution to our community.  But those motivations are not the reason why the complete free system, GNU/Linux, exists, and they won't secure our freedom in the future.  The public needs to know this.  Linus has the right to promote his views; however, people should be aware that the operating system in question stems from ideals of freedom, not from his views.
target: Nema ništa loše u pisanju slobodnog programa zbog želje za učenjem ili iz zabave, jezgra koju je Linus napisao iz tih razloga je velik doprinos našoj zajednici. No ovi motivi nisu razlog zašto kompletan slobodan sustav, GNU/Linux, postoji, i oni neće osigurati našu slobodu u budućnosti. Javnost mora ovo shvatiti. Linus ima pravo širiti svoje poglede, no ljudi bi trebali biti svjesni da ovaj operativni sustav potječe iz ideala slobode, a ne iz Linusovih pogleda.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Isn't it wrong for us to label Linus Torvalds' work as GNU? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#claimlinux">#claimlinux</a>)</span>
target: Nije li pogrešno označavati djelo Linusa Torvaldsa kao GNU? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#claimlinux">#claimlinux</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Does Linus Torvalds agree that Linux is just the kernel? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#linusagreed">#linusagreed</a>)</span>
target: Slaže li se Linus Torvalds u označavanju Linuxa samo kao jezgre? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#linusagreed">#linusagreed</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: The battle is already lost&mdash;society has made its decision and we can't change it, so why even think about it? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#lost">#lost</a>)</span>
target: Bitka je već izgubljena&mdash;društvo je donijelo odluku koju ne možemo promijeniti, čemu uopće razmišljati o tome? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#lost">#lost</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Society has made its decision and we can't change it, so what good does it do if I say &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#whatgood">#whatgood</a>)</span>
target: Društvo je donijelo odluku koju ne možemo promijeniti, koju razliku čini ako ja kažem &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#whatgood">#whatgood</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Wouldn't it be better to call the system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; and teach people its real origin with a ten-minute explanation? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#explain">#explain</a>)</span>
target: Ne bi li bilo bolje zvati sustav &ldquo;Linuxom&rdquo; i onda u nekoliko minuta objasniti ljudima njegovo porijeklo? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#explain">#explain</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: It is inefficient because it takes a lot more time.  Saying and writing &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; will take you only a few seconds a day, not minutes, so you can afford to reach far more people that way.  Distinguishing between Linux and GNU/Linux when you write and speak is by far the easiest way to help the GNU Project effectively.
target: Nije efikasna jer zahtijeva više vremena. Reći ili napisati &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; traje nekoliko sekundi, ne minuta, te tako možete doprijeti do većeg broja ljudi. Razlikovanje Linuxa i GNU/Linuxa u govoru i u pismu je najjednostavniji način efektnog pomaganja Projektu GNU.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Some people laugh at you when you ask them to call the system GNU/Linux.  Why do you subject yourself to this treatment? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#treatment">#treatment</a>)</span>
target: Neki ljudi vam se smiju kada im kažete da bi sustav trebali zvati GNU/Linux. Zašto se sami podvrgavate ismijavanju? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#treatment">#treatment</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: Calling the system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; tends to give people a mistaken picture of the system's history and reason for existence.  People who laugh at our request probably have picked up that mistaken picture&mdash;they think our work was done by Linus, so they laugh when we ask for credit for it.  If they knew the truth, they probably wouldn't laugh.
target: Nazivanje sustava &ldquo;Linuxom&rdquo; daje pogrešnu sliku o povijesti i razlogu postojanja tog sustava. Ljudi koji se smiju našem zahtjevu vjerojatno vjeruju u tu pograšnu priču&mdash;smatraju da je Linus odradio naš posao, te se smiju kada tražimo da se prizna naš rad. Da znaju istinu, vjerojatno se ne bi smijali.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Why do we take the risk of making a request that sometimes leads people to ridicule us? Because often it has useful results that help the GNU Project.  We will run the risk of undeserved abuse to achieve our goals.
target: Zašto riskiramo ismijavanje s nekim od naših zahtjeva? Zato što često kao rezultat dobijemo pomoć Projektu GNU. Riskirat ćemo i dalje to nezasluženo zlostavljanje kako bismo ostvarili naše ciljeve.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: If you see such an ironically unfair situation occurring, please don't sit idly by.  Please teach the laughing people the real history.  When they see why the request is justified, those who have any sense will stop laughing.
target: Ukoliko vidite ironičnu i nepoštenu situaciju, nemojte samo promatrati. Molimo, poučite ljude istini. Kada ljudi shvate zašto je taj zahtjev opravdan, oni s malo razuma će se prestati ismijavati.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Some people condemn you when you ask them to call the system GNU/Linux.  Don't you lose by alienating them? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#alienate">#alienate</a>)</span>
target: Neki ljudi vas osuđuju kada ih tražite da sustav zovu GNU/Linux. Ne gubite li njihovim otuđivanjem? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#alienate">#alienate</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: Not much.  People who don't appreciate our role in developing the system are unlikely to make substantial efforts to help us.  If they do work that advances our goals, such as releasing free software, it is probably for other unrelated reasons, not because we asked them.  Meanwhile, by teaching others to attribute our work to someone else, they are undermining our ability to recruit the help of others.
target: Ne mnogo. Ljudi koji ne cijene našu ulogu u razvoju sustava vjerojatno nam neće mnogo ni pomoći. Ukoliko i rade nešto što pomaže u ostvarivanju naših ciljeva (npr. razvijaju slobodan softver), vjerojatno to rade iz svojih razloga, a ne jer smo ih zatražili. Usto, učeći druge da pripisuju naš rad drugima, potkopavaju našu mogućnost pridobivanja pomoći od drugih.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: It makes no sense to worry about alienating people who are already mostly uncooperative, and it is self-defeating to be deterred from correcting a major problem lest we anger the people who perpetuate it.  Therefore, we will continue trying to correct the misnomer.
target: Nema smisla zabrinjavati se otuđivanjem ljudi koji većinom ne surađuju, a odustajanje od ispravka problema kako ne bismo naljutili one koji produbljuju taj problem vodi u predaju. Stoga, nastavit ćemo s pokušajima ispravka ovog pogrešnog naziva.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Whatever you contributed, is it legitimate to rename the operating system? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#rename">#rename</a>)</span>
target: Bez obzira na vaš doprinos, je li legitimno preimenovati operativni sustav? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#rename">#rename</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: We are not renaming anything; we have been calling this system &ldquo;GNU&rdquo; ever since we announced it in 1983.  The people who tried to rename it to &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; should not have done so.
target: Ne preimenujemo ništa, sustav zovemo  &ldquo;GNU&rdquo; od 1983. kada smo ga najavili. Ljudi koji su ga pokušali preimenovati u  &ldquo;Linux&rdquo; su u krivu i nisu to trebali napraviti.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Isn't it wrong to force people to call the system &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#force">#force</a>)</span>
target: Nije li pogrešno prisiljavati ljude da sustav zovu &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#force">#force</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Why not sue people who call the whole system &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#whynotsue">#whynotsue</a>)</span>
target: Zašto ne tužite ljude koji cijeli sustav zovu &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#whynotsue">#whynotsue</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: There are no legal grounds to sue them, but since we believe in freedom of speech, we wouldn't want to do that anyway.  We ask people to call the system &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; because that is the right thing to do.
target: Nemamo osnove za tužbu, i, kako vjerujemo u slobodu govora, to ni ne bismo htjeli napraviti. Tražimo od ljudi da sustav zovu &ldquo;GNU/Linux&rdquo; zato jer je to ispravno.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Shouldn't you put something in the GNU GPL to require people to call the system &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#require">#require</a>)</span>
target: Ne biste li trebali dodati nešto u GNU GPL čime bi ljudi bili primorani zvati sustav &ldquo;GNU&rdquo;? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#require">#require</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Since you objected to the original BSD license's advertising requirement to give credit to the University of California, isn't it hypocritical to demand credit for the GNU project? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#BSDlicense">#BSDlicense</a>)</span>
target: S obzirom na to da ste se protivili prvotnoj licenci BSD koja je tražila da se odaje priznanje Sveučilištu u Kaliforniji, nije li licemjerno zahtijevati priznanje za Projekt GNU? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#BSDlicense">#BSDlicense</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: It would be hypocritical to make the name GNU/Linux a license requirement, and we don't.  We only <em>ask</em> you to give us the credit we deserve.
target: Bilo bi licemjerno da je naziv GNU/Linux dio licence, stoga to ni ne činimo. Mi samo tražimo da nam odate priznanje koje zaslužujemo.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Please note that there are at least <a href="/licenses/bsd.html"> two different BSD licenses</a>.  For clarity's sake, please don't use the term &ldquo;BSD license&rdquo; without specifying which one.
target: Primijetite da postoje barem <a href="/licenses/bsd.html">dvije različite licence BSD</a>. Zbog jasnoće, molimo da ne koristite termin &ldquo;licenca BSD&rdquo; a da ne naznačite o kojoj se radi.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: The question presupposes a rather controversial general ethical premise: that if people do not force you to treat them fairly, you are entitled to take advantage of them as much as you like.  In other words, it assumes that might makes right.
target: Ovo pitanje pretpostavlja kontroverznu općenitu etičku premisu: ukoliko vas netko ne natjera da ga tretirate pošteno, imate pravo iskorištavati ga po vlastitoj želji i volji. Drugim riječima, pretpostavlja da snaga caruje.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: We hope you disagree with that premise just as we do.
target: Nadamo se da dijelite naše neslaganje s ovom premisom.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Wouldn't you be better off not contradicting what so many people believe? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#contradict">#contradict</a>)</span>
target: Ne bi li bilo bolje da ne proturječite onome što većina ljudi vjeruje? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#contradict">#contradict</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd>
en: We don't think we should go along with large numbers of people because they have been misled.  We hope you too will decide that truth is important.
target: Ne smatramo da trebamo slijediti većinu koja je zavarana. Nadamo se da ćete i vi shvatiti kako je istina važna.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: We could never have developed a free operating system without first denying the belief, held by most people, that proprietary software was legitimate and acceptable.
target: Nikad ne bismo bili u stanju razviti slobodan operativni sustav da nismo prvo odbacili većinsko vjerovanje kako je vlasnički softver legitiman i prihvatljiv.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: We don't think that the popularity of an error makes it the truth.
target: Ne smatramo da popularnost grešku čini istinom.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: Many people care about what's convenient or who's winning, not about arguments of right or wrong.  Couldn't you get more of their support by a different road? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#winning">#winning</a>)</span>
target: Većina ljudi mari za ono što je prikladno ili tko pobjeđuje, a ne mare za rasprave o pravom ili krivom. Ne biste li imali više podrške da probate na drugačiji način?<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#winning">#winning</a>)</span>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: We hope that you are one of those for whom right and wrong do matter.
target: Nadamo se da ste i vi jedni od onih kojima su dobro i zlo važni.

note: type: Content of: <div><div><p>
en: Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.  There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
target: Molimo vas, općenite upite o FSF &amp; GNU šaljite na <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.  Postoje i <a href="/contact/">drugi načini kontaktiranja</a> FSF-a. Neispravne poveznice i ostale ispravke ili prijedloge možete poslati na <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: This page is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.
target: Ovo djelo je dano na korištenje pod licencom <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.hr">Creative Commons Imenovanje-Bez prerada 4.0 međunarodna</a>.

note: timestamp start type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Updated:
target: Vrijeme zadnje izmjene:
