manifesto.html - en to hr translation catalogue (97 entries)

note: type: Content of: <title>
en: The GNU Manifesto - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
hr: GNU manifest - GNU projekt - Zaklada za slobodan softver

note: type: Content of: <div><h2>
en: The GNU Manifesto
hr: GNU manifest

note: type: Content of: <div><div><p>
en: Since that time, we have learned about certain common misunderstandings that different wording could help avoid.  Footnotes added since 1993 help clarify these points.
hr: Od tog vremena, naučili smo o određenim uobičajenim krivim shvaćanjima nekih dijelova engleskog originala koja bi se izbjegla da je tekst drugačije sročen. Bilješke dodane od 1993. pojašnjavaju ove stavke.

note: type: Content of: <div><h3>
en: What's GNU? Gnu's Not Unix!
hr: Što je GNU? Gnu Nije Unix!

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: So far we have an Emacs text editor with Lisp for writing editor commands, a source level debugger, a yacc-compatible parser generator, a linker, and around 35 utilities.  A shell (command interpreter) is nearly completed.  A new portable optimizing C compiler has compiled itself and may be released this year.  An initial kernel exists but many more features are needed to emulate Unix.  When the kernel and compiler are finished, it will be possible to distribute a GNU system suitable for program development.  We will use TeX as our text formatter, but an nroff is being worked on.  We will use the free, portable X Window System as well.  After this we will add a portable Common Lisp, an Empire game, a spreadsheet, and hundreds of other things, plus online documentation.  We hope to supply, eventually, everything useful that normally comes with a Unix system, and more.
hr: Zasada imamo uređivač teksta Emacs sa Lispom za pisanje naredbi uređivača, program za praćenje izvršenja drugih programa na razini izvornog koda (<i>source level debugger</i>), generator raščlanjivača kompatibilan s yacc-om, povezivač (<i>linker</i>), i oko 35 pomoćnih programa. Ljuska (izvođač naredbi) je skoro gotova. Novi prenosivi optimizirajući C kompajler je kompilirao samog sebe i možda će biti pušteni u javnost kasnije ove godine. Osnovna jezgra (<i>kernel</i>) postoji no još mnoge mogućnosti su potrebne da bismo emulirali Unix. Kada jezgra i kompajler budu gotovi, bit će moguće distribuirati GNU sustav dovoljan za razvoj softvera. Koristiti ćemo TeX kao svoj oblikovatelj teksta, ali radimo na nroff-u. Koristiti ćemo i slobodan, prenosivi X Window System. Nakon ovoga, dodat ćemo prenosivi Common Lisp, igru Empire, tablični kalkulator, i stotine drugih stvari, kao i elektroničku dokumentaciju. Nadamo se da ćemo, jednom, ponuditi sve korisno što uobičajeno dolazi sa Unix sustavom, i više.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: GNU will be able to run Unix programs, but will not be identical to Unix.  We will make all improvements that are convenient, based on our experience with other operating systems.  In particular, we plan to have longer file names, file version numbers, a crashproof file system, file name completion perhaps, terminal-independent display support, and perhaps eventually a Lisp-based window system through which several Lisp programs and ordinary Unix programs can share a screen.  Both C and Lisp will be available as system programming languages.  We will try to support UUCP, MIT Chaosnet, and Internet protocols for communication.
hr: GNU će moći pokretati Unix programe, no neće biti identičan Unixu. Napravit ćemo sva poboljšanja koja smatramo korisnima, prema našem iskustvu sa drugim operativnim sustavima. Točnije, namjeravamo imati dulja imena datoteka, oznake verzija datoteka, datotečni sustav sa zaštitom od raspada, možda i dovršavanje imena datoteka, podršku za prikaz neovisan o terminalu, i jednom možda i prozorski sustav bazirani na Lispu kroz koji će više Lisp programa i običnih Unix programa moći dijeliti ekran. I C i Lisp će biti dostupni kao sistemski programski jezici. Probati ćemo podržavati protokole za komunikaciju UUCP, MIT Chaosnet i Internet.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: GNU is aimed initially at machines in the 68000/16000 class with virtual memory, because they are the easiest machines to make it run on.  The extra effort to make it run on smaller machines will be left to someone who wants to use it on them.
hr: GNU je u početku namijenjen ponajviše strojevima u klasi 68000/16000-ice sa virtualnom memorijom, jer su to najjednostavniji strojevi na kojima ga možemo natjerati da radi. Dodatni trud potreban da ga pokrenemo i na manjim strojevima će biti ostavljen nekome tko želi koristiti GNU na njima.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: To avoid horrible confusion, please pronounce the <em>g</em> in the word &ldquo;GNU&rdquo; when it is the name of this project.
hr: Da izbjegnemo strašnu zbrku, molimo da kažete <em>g</em> u riječi &ldquo;GNU&rdquo; kada je to ime ovog projekta.<sup><a href="#TransNote1">1</a></sup>

note: type: Content of: <div><h3>
en: Why I Must Write GNU
hr: Zašto moram napisati GNU

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: I consider that the Golden Rule requires that if I like a program I must share it with other people who like it.  Software sellers want to divide the users and conquer them, making each user agree not to share with others.  I refuse to break solidarity with other users in this way.  I cannot in good conscience sign a nondisclosure agreement or a software license agreement.  For years I worked within the Artificial Intelligence Lab to resist such tendencies and other inhospitalities, but eventually they had gone too far: I could not remain in an institution where such things are done for me against my will.
hr: Smatram da postoji zlatno pravilo koje zahtjeva da dijelim program koji mi se sviđa sa drugima kojima se on sviđa. Prodavači softvera žele podijeliti korisnike i osvojiti ih, tako da zahtijevaju od svakog korisnika da se složi da neće dijeliti sa drugima. Odbijam ne biti solidaran s drugim korisnicima na ovaj način. Ne mogu sa čistom savješću potpisati sporazum o tajnosti ili softverski licenčni ugovor. Tijekom godina u kojima sam radio u Laboratoriju za Umjetnu Inteligenciju pokušao sam se odupirati takvim strujanjima i drugim ne-gostoljubivostima, no u jednom trenutku otišli su predaleko: nisam mogao ostati u ustanovi u kojoj se takve stvari rade protiv moje volje.

note: type: Content of: <div><h3>
en: Why GNU Will Be Compatible with Unix
hr: Zašto će GNU biti kompatibilan s Unixom

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Unix is not my ideal system, but it is not too bad.  The essential features of Unix seem to be good ones, and I think I can fill in what Unix lacks without spoiling them.  And a system compatible with Unix would be convenient for many other people to adopt.
hr: Unix, po meni, nije idealan sustav, no nije previše loš. Osnovne osobine Unixa čine se dobrima, i mislim kako se ono što Unixu nedostaje može popuniti bez da uništim te osobine. A sustav kompatibilan s Unixom bio bi jednostavan za prihvaćanje mnogim drugim ljudima.

note: type: Content of: <div><h3>
en: How GNU Will Be Available
hr: Kako će GNU biti dostupan

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: GNU is not in the public domain.  Everyone will be permitted to modify and redistribute GNU, but no distributor will be allowed to restrict its further redistribution.  That is to say, <a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary</a> modifications will not be allowed.  I want to make sure that all versions of GNU remain free.
hr: GNU nije javno vlasništvo. Svakome će biti dozvoljeno mijenjati i ponovno distribuirati GNU, ali nijednom distributeru neće biti dozvoljeno da se ograniči daljnje distribuiranje. Da tako kažemo, <a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">vlasničke (<i>proprietary</i>)</a> izmjene neće biti dozvoljene. Želim osigurati da će sve inačice GNU-a ostati slobodne.

note: type: Content of: <div><h3>
en: Why Many Other Programmers Want to Help
hr: Zašto mnogi drugi programeri žele pomoći

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: I have found many other programmers who are excited about GNU and want to help.
hr: Pronašao sam mnogo programera koji su uzbuđeni oko GNU-a i žele pomoći.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Many programmers are unhappy about the commercialization of system software.  It may enable them to make more money, but it requires them to feel in conflict with other programmers in general rather than feel as comrades.  The fundamental act of friendship among programmers is the sharing of programs; marketing arrangements now typically used essentially forbid programmers to treat others as friends.  The purchaser of software must choose between friendship and obeying the law.  Naturally, many decide that friendship is more important.  But those who believe in law often do not feel at ease with either choice.  They become cynical and think that programming is just a way of making money.
hr: Mnogi programeri su nezadovoljni komercijalizacijom sistemskog softvera. Možda im omogućava da zarađuju više novca, no zahtjeva da se općenito osjećaju u sukobu s drugim programerima umjesto da se osjećaju drugovima. Osnovni čin prijateljstva među programerima je dijeljenje programa; današnji tržišni način rada u osnovi zabranjuje programerima da se prema drugima odnose kao prema prijateljima. Kupac softvera mora odabrati između prijateljstva i poštovanja zakona. Prirodno, mnogi odlučuju da je prijateljstvo bitnije. Ali oni koji vjeruju u zakon često se ne osjećaju dobro sa bilo kojim odabirom. Postaju cinični i misle da je programiranje samo način za zaradu.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: By working on and using GNU rather than proprietary programs, we can be hospitable to everyone and obey the law.  In addition, GNU serves as an example to inspire and a banner to rally others to join us in sharing.  This can give us a feeling of harmony which is impossible if we use software that is not free.  For about half the programmers I talk to, this is an important happiness that money cannot replace.
hr: Radom i korištenjem GNU-a umjesto vlasničkih programa, možemo biti gostoljubivi prema svima i istovremeno poštivati zakon. Dodatno, GNU služi kao primjer za inspiraciju i kao zastava koja će povesti druge da nam se pridruže u dijeljenju. Ovo nam može dati osjećaj harmonije koji je nemoguć ako koristimo softver koji nije slobodan. Za oko pola programera s kojima razgovaram, ovo je bitna sreća koju novac ne može zamijeniti.

note: type: Content of: <div><h3>
en: How You Can Contribute
hr: Kako vi možete pripomoći

note: type: Content of: <div><div><p>
en: (Nowadays, for software tasks to work on, see the <a href="http://fsf.org/campaigns/priority-projects">High Priority Projects list</a> and the <a href="http://savannah.gnu.org/people/?type_id=1">GNU Help Wanted list</a>, the general task list for GNU software packages. For other ways to help, see <a href="/help/help.html">the guide to helping the GNU operating system</a>.)
hr: (Danas, da biste vidjeli softverske zadaće na kojima možete raditi, pogledajte <a href="http://fsf.org/campaigns/priority-projects">popis projekata visokog prioriteta</a> i <a href="http://savannah.gnu.org/people/?type_id=1">GNU popis tražene pomoći</a>, općeniti popis zadaća za GNU softverske pakete. Za druge načine na koje možete pomoći, pogledajte <a href="/help/help.html">vodič za pomaganje GNU operativnoga sustava</a>.)

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: I am asking computer manufacturers for donations of machines and money.  I'm asking individuals for donations of programs and work.
hr: Tražim proizvođače računala za donacije strojeva i novca. Tražim pojedince za donacije programa i rada.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: One consequence you can expect if you donate machines is that GNU will run on them at an early date.  The machines should be complete, ready to use systems, approved for use in a residential area, and not in need of sophisticated cooling or power.
hr: Jedna posljedica koju možete očekivati donacijom strojeva je da će se GNU na njima vrtiti vrlo rano. Strojevi trebaju biti potpuni, sustavi spremni za uporabu, odobreni za uporabu u naseljenim područjima, i da ne trebaju sofisticirano hlađenje ili napajanje.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: I have found very many programmers eager to contribute part-time work for GNU.  For most projects, such part-time distributed work would be very hard to coordinate; the independently written parts would not work together.  But for the particular task of replacing Unix, this problem is absent.  A complete Unix system contains hundreds of utility programs, each of which is documented separately.  Most interface specifications are fixed by Unix compatibility.  If each contributor can write a compatible replacement for a single Unix utility, and make it work properly in place of the original on a Unix system, then these utilities will work right when put together.  Even allowing for Murphy to create a few unexpected problems, assembling these components will be a feasible task.  (The kernel will require closer communication and will be worked on by a small, tight group.)
hr: Shvatio sam da su mnogi programeri željni dati slobodno vrijeme za rad na GNU. Za većinu projekata, takav povremeni distribuirani rad bio bi vrlo težak za koordinaciju; nezavisno pisani dijelovi ne bi radili zajedno. No za konkretnu zadaću zamjene Unixa, ovaj problem ne postoji. Potpun Unix sustav sadrži stotine pomoćnih programa, od kojih je svaki zasebno dokumentiran. Većina specifikacija sučelja su fiksne radi kompatibilnosti Unixa. Ako svaki pridonositelj može napisati kompatibilnu zamjenu za jedan Unix alat, i da ga natjera da radi kako treba umjesto originala na Unix sustavu, tada će svi ovi alati raditi kako valja kad ih se složi zajedno. Čak i ako damo Murphyju da stvori nekoliko neočekivanih problema, slaganje ovih komponenti zajedno biti će jednostavna zadaća. (Jezgra će zahtijevati bližu komunikaciju i morati će se razvijati od strane male, uske grupe.)

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: If I get donations of money, I may be able to hire a few people full or part time.  The salary won't be high by programmers' standards, but I'm looking for people for whom building community spirit is as important as making money.  I view this as a way of enabling dedicated people to devote their full energies to working on GNU by sparing them the need to make a living in another way.
hr: Ako dobijem novčane donacije, možda ću moći zaposliti nekoliko ljudi da rade puno ili djelomično radno vrijeme. Plaća neće biti visoka po programerskim standardima, no tražim ljude kojima je građenje društvenog duha važno kao i zarada. Ovo vidim kao način da omogućim zainteresiranim ljudima da posvete punu energiju na rad na GNU-u poštedom od potrebe da zarade za život na neki drugi način.

note: type: Content of: <div><h3>
en: Why All Computer Users Will Benefit
hr: Zašto će svi korisnici računala imati koristi

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: This means much more than just saving everyone the price of a Unix license.  It means that much wasteful duplication of system programming effort will be avoided.  This effort can go instead into advancing the state of the art.
hr: Ovo znači mnogo više od pukog uklanjanja cijene licence Unixa. Ovo znači da će se bespotrebno gubljenje vremena na programiranje izbjeći. To vrijeme može umjesto toga ići u unaprjeđivanje tehnologije.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Complete system sources will be available to everyone.  As a result, a user who needs changes in the system will always be free to make them himself, or hire any available programmer or company to make them for him.  Users will no longer be at the mercy of one programmer or company which owns the sources and is in sole position to make changes.
hr: Potpuni izvorni kod sistemskog softvera bit će dostupan svakome. Na taj način, korisnik koji treba promjene u sustavu uvijek će moći slobodno sam napraviti promjene, ili platiti bilo kojem programeru ili kompaniji da ih naprave umjesto njega. Korisnici više neće biti u milosti jednog programera ili kompanije koja posjeduje izvorni kod i jedina ima mogućnost napraviti izmjene.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Schools will be able to provide a much more educational environment by encouraging all students to study and improve the system code.  Harvard's computer lab used to have the policy that no program could be installed on the system if its sources were not on public display, and upheld it by actually refusing to install certain programs.  I was very much inspired by this.
hr: Škole će moći pružiti mnogo edukativnije okruženje potičući učenike da proučavaju i poboljšavaju sistemski kod. Harvardov računalni laboratorij nekad je imao odredbu da se niti jedan program nije smio instalirati na sustav ako njegov izvorni kod nije bio javan, i držali se toga tako da su stvarno odbijali instalirati određene programe. Ovo me snažno nadahnulo.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Finally, the overhead of considering who owns the system software and what one is or is not entitled to do with it will be lifted.
hr: Konačno, gubljenje vremena na razmišljanje tko je vlasnik sistemskog softvera i što se smije ili ne smije činiti s njim bit će uklonjeno.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Arrangements to make people pay for using a program, including licensing of copies, always incur a tremendous cost to society through the cumbersome mechanisms necessary to figure out how much (that is, which programs) a person must pay for.  And only a police state can force everyone to obey them.  Consider a space station where air must be manufactured at great cost: charging each breather per liter of air may be fair, but wearing the metered gas mask all day and all night is intolerable even if everyone can afford to pay the air bill.  And the TV cameras everywhere to see if you ever take the mask off are outrageous.  It's better to support the air plant with a head tax and chuck the masks.
hr: Ugovori koji zahtijevaju ljude da plate za korištenje programa, uključujući licenciranje kopija, uvijek izazivaju ogromne troškove društvu kroz nespretne mehanizme koji su potrebni da bi se odredilo koliko, odnosno za koje programe, pojedinac mora platiti. I samo policijska država može natjerati svakoga da se pokore tim mehanizmima. Zamislite svemirsku postaju gdje se zrak mora vrlo skupo proizvoditi; naplata svakome tko diše prema jednoj litri zraka možda je pošteno, no nošenje maske za disanje s mjeračem cijeli dan i noć je nepodnošljivo čak i ako si svatko može priuštiti plaćanje računa za zrak. A TV kamere koje su svagdje da bi vidjele da li ikada skidate masku su strašne. Bolje je podržavati tvornicu zraka porezom po glavi stanovnika i jednostavno odbaciti maske.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Copying all or parts of a program is as natural to a programmer as breathing, and as productive.  It ought to be as free.
hr: Kopiranje svih ili dijelova programa je prirodno programeru poput disanja, i jednako produktivno. Mora biti slobodno.

note: type: Content of: <div><h3>
en: Some Easily Rebutted Objections to GNU's Goals
hr: Neki jednostavno odbacivi prigovori ciljevima GNU-a

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;Nobody will use it if it is free, because that means they can't rely on any support.&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Nitko ga neće koristiti ako je besplatan, jer to znači da nemaju podršku na koju se mogu pouzdati.&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;You have to charge for the program to pay for providing the support.&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Morate naplaćivati za program kako biste platili pružanje podrške.&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: We must distinguish between support in the form of real programming work and mere handholding.  The former is something one cannot rely on from a software vendor.  If your problem is not shared by enough people, the vendor will tell you to get lost.
hr: Moramo razlikovati podršku u obliku stvarnog programiranja i jednostavnog držanja za ruku. Ono prvo je nešto na što se pojedinac ne može osloniti kod prodavača softvera. Ako vaš problem ne dijeli dovoljno ljudi, prodavač će vam reći da se gonite.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: If your business needs to be able to rely on support, the only way is to have all the necessary sources and tools.  Then you can hire any available person to fix your problem; you are not at the mercy of any individual.  With Unix, the price of sources puts this out of consideration for most businesses.  With GNU this will be easy.  It is still possible for there to be no available competent person, but this problem cannot be blamed on distribution arrangements.  GNU does not eliminate all the world's problems, only some of them.
hr: Ako se vaša kompanija mora moći osloniti na podršku, jedini način je da imate sav potreban izvorni kod i alate. Tada možete zaposliti bilo koju dostupnu osobu da vam popravi vaš problem; ne biste bili na milost i nemilost bilo kojeg pojedinca. Sa Unixom, cijena izvornog koda ovo čini nemogućim većini kompanija. Sa GNU-om ovo će biti jednostavno. Još uvijek će biti moguće da nema kompetentne osobe, no ovaj problem ne može se baciti na način distribucije. GNU ne rješava sve svjetske probleme, samo neke.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Meanwhile, the users who know nothing about computers need handholding: doing things for them which they could easily do themselves but don't know how.
hr: U međuvremenu, korisnici koji ne znaju ništa o računalima trebaju držanje za ruku: trebaju da netko za njih učini ono što bi i oni sami jednostavno mogli no ne znaju kako.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Such services could be provided by companies that sell just handholding and repair service.  If it is true that users would rather spend money and get a product with service, they will also be willing to buy the service having got the product free.  The service companies will compete in quality and price; users will not be tied to any particular one.  Meanwhile, those of us who don't need the service should be able to use the program without paying for the service.
hr: Takve usluge mogu nuditi tvrtke koje prodaju samo držanje za ruku i uslugu popravka. Ako je istina da bi ljudi radije potrošili novac i dobili proizvod s uslugom, tada će rado kupiti i uslugu kad već dobiju proizvod besplatno. Ove uslužne tvrtke će se natjecati u kvaliteti i cijeni; korisnici neće biti vezani uz pojedinu. U međuvremenu, oni od nas koji ne trebaju uslugu će morati moći koristiti program i bez plaćanja za uslugu.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;You cannot reach many people without advertising, and you must charge for the program to support that.&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Ne možete dosegnuti mnogo ljudi bez oglašavanja, i morate naplatiti program da biste to podržavali.&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;It's no use advertising a program people can get free.&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Beskorisno je oglašavati program do kojeg ljudi mogu doći besplatno.&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: There are various forms of free or very cheap publicity that can be used to inform numbers of computer users about something like GNU.  But it may be true that one can reach more microcomputer users with advertising.  If this is really so, a business which advertises the service of copying and mailing GNU for a fee ought to be successful enough to pay for its advertising and more.  This way, only the users who benefit from the advertising pay for it.
hr: Postoje razni načini besplatnog ili vrlo jeftinog publiciteta koji se mogu koristiti za obavijestiti računalne korisnike o nečem poput GNU-a. No možda je istina da pojedinac može doći do više korisnika mikroračunala koristeći oglašavanje. Ako je ovo istina, kompanija koja oglašava uslugu kopiranja i slanja GNU-a za novac morala bi biti dovoljno uspješna da plati za svoje oglašavanje i više. Na ovaj način, samo korisnici koji imaju koristi od oglašavanja plate za njega.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;My company needs a proprietary operating system to get a competitive edge.&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Moja kompanija treba vlasnički operativni sustav da bi dobila na konkurentnosti.&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: GNU will remove operating system software from the realm of competition.  You will not be able to get an edge in this area, but neither will your competitors be able to get an edge over you.  You and they will compete in other areas, while benefiting mutually in this one.  If your business is selling an operating system, you will not like GNU, but that's tough on you.  If your business is something else, GNU can save you from being pushed into the expensive business of selling operating systems.
hr: GNU će ukloniti operativne sustave iz područja konkurentnosti. Nećete moći dobiti prednost na ovom području, no neće ni vaši konkurenti. Vi i oni ćete se natjecati u drugim područjima, dok ćete u ovom oboje surađivati. Ako vaša kompanija prodaje operativni sustav, GNU vam se neće svidjeti, no to je vaš problem. Ako je vaš posao nešto drugo, GNU vas može spasiti od polaska u skupi posao prodaje operativnih sustava.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;Don't programmers deserve a reward for their creativity?&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Ne zaslužuju li programeri nagradu za svoju kreativnost?&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: If anything deserves a reward, it is social contribution.  Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results.  If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they restrict the use of these programs.
hr: Ako išta zaslužuje nagradu, to je pomaganje društvu. Kreativnost može biti pomaganje društvu, no samo ako je društvo slobodno da koristi rezultate. Ako programeri zaslužuju nagradu za stvaranje inovativnih programa, na isti način trebaju biti kažnjeni ako ograničuju uporabu ovih programa.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;Shouldn't a programmer be able to ask for a reward for his creativity?&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Ne bi li programer trebao moći tražiti nagradu za svoju kreativnost?&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: There is nothing wrong with wanting pay for work, or seeking to maximize one's income, as long as one does not use means that are destructive.  But the means customary in the field of software today are based on destruction.
hr: Ne postoji ništa loše u želji za plaćom za rad, ili željom za povećanjem svojeg dohotka, dok god taj pojedinac ne koristi destruktivne mjere. Ali mjere koje su danas uobičajene u području softvera zasnovane su na destruktivnosti.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Extracting money from users of a program by restricting their use of it is destructive because the restrictions reduce the amount and the ways that the program can be used.  This reduces the amount of wealth that humanity derives from the program.  When there is a deliberate choice to restrict, the harmful consequences are deliberate destruction.
hr: Izvlačenje novca od korisnika programa ograničavanjem njegove uporabe je destruktivno jer ograničenja smanjuju količinu i način na koji se program može koristiti. Ovo smanjuje količinu bogatstva koje čovječanstvo dobiva od programa. Kada postoji namjerni odabir da se ograniči, štetne posljedice su namjerno uništenje.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The reason a good citizen does not use such destructive means to become wealthier is that, if everyone did so, we would all become poorer from the mutual destructiveness.  This is Kantian ethics; or, the Golden Rule.  Since I do not like the consequences that result if everyone hoards information, I am required to consider it wrong for one to do so.  Specifically, the desire to be rewarded for one's creativity does not justify depriving the world in general of all or part of that creativity.
hr: Razlog zašto dobar građanin ne koristi takve destruktivne mjere da bi postao bogatiji je jer, ako bi svatko tako činio, svi bismo postali siromašniji od međusobne destruktivnosti. Ovo je Kantovska etika; ili, Zlatno Pravilo. Budući da ne volim posljedice koje se stvaraju ako svatko skriva informacije, nužno smatram da je zlo činiti takvo što. Točnije, želja da se bude nagrađen za kreativnost ne opravdava sprječavanje svijeta da koristi svu ili dio te kreativnosti.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;Won't programmers starve?&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Neće li programeri gladovati?&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: I could answer that nobody is forced to be a programmer.  Most of us cannot manage to get any money for standing on the street and making faces.  But we are not, as a result, condemned to spend our lives standing on the street making faces, and starving.  We do something else.
hr: Mogao bih odgovoriti da nitko nije prisiljeni biti programer. Većina nas ne može zaraditi novac za stajanje na ulici i pravljenjem grimasa. No mi nismo, kao rezultat, prisiljeni provoditi naš život stajući na ulici i gladujući. Činimo nešto drugo.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: But that is the wrong answer because it accepts the questioner's implicit assumption: that without ownership of software, programmers cannot possibly be paid a cent.  Supposedly it is all or nothing.
hr: No to je krivi odgovor jer prihvaća implicitnu pretpostavku postavljača pitanja: da bez vlasništva nad softverom, programeri ne mogu biti plaćeni ni centa. Navodno je sve ili ništa.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The real reason programmers will not starve is that it will still be possible for them to get paid for programming; just not paid as much as now.
hr: Pravi razlog zašto programeri neće gladovati je da će još uvijek biti moguće da budu plaćeni za programiranje; samo ne plaćeni koliko sada.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Probably programming will not be as lucrative on the new basis as it is now.  But that is not an argument against the change.  It is not considered an injustice that sales clerks make the salaries that they now do.  If programmers made the same, that would not be an injustice either.  (In practice they would still make considerably more than that.)
hr: Vjerojatno programiranje neće biti toliko isplativo na novoj osnovi kao danas. No to nije argument protiv promjene. Ne smatra se nepravdom kada prodavači u trgovinama zarađuju koliko zarađuju. Kada bi programeri isto toliko zarađivali, ni to ne bi bila nepravda. (U praksi bi i dalje zarađivali mnogo više nego prodavači.)

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;Don't people have a right to control how their creativity is used?&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Nemaju li ljudi pravo da kontroliraju kako se njihova kreativnost koristi?&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: &ldquo;Control over the use of one's ideas&rdquo; really constitutes control over other people's lives; and it is usually used to make their lives more difficult.
hr: &ldquo;Kontrola nad uporabom ideja pojedinca&rdquo; ustvari je kontrola nad tuđim životima; i obično se koristi da bi učinila njihove živote težima.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: For example, the patent system was established to encourage inventors to disclose the details of their inventions.  Its purpose was to help society rather than to help inventors.  At the time, the life span of 17 years for a patent was short compared with the rate of advance of the state of the art.  Since patents are an issue only among manufacturers, for whom the cost and effort of a license agreement are small compared with setting up production, the patents often do not do much harm.  They do not obstruct most individuals who use patented products.
hr: Na primjer, patentni sustav je uspostavljen kako bi potaknuo izumitelje da objave detalje svojih izuma. Njegova svrha bila je da pomogne društvu više nego izumiteljima. U to vrijeme, životni vijek patenta u trajanju od 17 godina bio je kratak u usporedbi s brzinom napretka tehnologije. Budući da su patenti problem samo među proizvođačima, kojima cijena i napor licenčnog ugovora su minimalni u usporedbi sa postavljanjem proizvodnje, patenti često ne čine mnogo štete. Ne rade probleme većini pojedinaca koji koriste patentirane proizvode.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The idea of copyright did not exist in ancient times, when authors frequently copied other authors at length in works of nonfiction.  This practice was useful, and is the only way many authors' works have survived even in part.  The copyright system was created expressly for the purpose of encouraging authorship.  In the domain for which it was invented&mdash;books, which could be copied economically only on a printing press&mdash;it did little harm, and did not obstruct most of the individuals who read the books.
hr: Ideja autorskih prava (<i>copyright</i>) nije postojala u antici, kada su autori često kopirali djela drugih autora u cijelosti u ne-fiktivnim djelima. Ovo je bilo korisno, i to je bio jedini način na koji su djela mnogih autora preživjela barem djelomično. Sustav autorskih prava je izmišljen čisto kako bi poticao autorstvo. U području u kojem je izmišljen&mdash;knjige, koje su mogle biti kopirane ekonomično jedino na tiskarskom stroju&mdash;učinio je malo štete, a nije smetao većini pojedinaca koji čitaju knjige.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: All intellectual property rights are just licenses granted by society because it was thought, rightly or wrongly, that society as a whole would benefit by granting them.  But in any particular situation, we have to ask: are we really better off granting such license? What kind of act are we licensing a person to do?
hr: Sva prava intelektualnog vlasništva su samo licence, samo dozvole koje je društvo dalo jer se smatralo, pravo ili krivo, da društvo kao cjelina će imati koristi od davanja istih. No u bilo kojoj situaciji trebamo se zapitati: imamo li stvarno koristi od davanja takve licence? Kakav čin dozvoljavamo pojedincu da čini?

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The case of programs today is very different from that of books a hundred years ago.  The fact that the easiest way to copy a program is from one neighbor to another, the fact that a program has both source code and object code which are distinct, and the fact that a program is used rather than read and enjoyed, combine to create a situation in which a person who enforces a copyright is harming society as a whole both materially and spiritually; in which a person should not do so regardless of whether the law enables him to.
hr: Slučaj programa je danas vrlo različit od knjiga prije više stotina godina. Činjenica da je najjednostavniji način za kopiranje programa baš onaj od jednog susjeda do drugog, činjenica da program ima i izvorni kod i objektni kod koji se razlikuju, i činjenica da se program koristi, a ne čita i uživa u njemu, kombiniraju se kako bi stvorili situaciju u kojoj osoba koja koristi autorsko pravo ustvari šteti društvu kao cjelini i materijalno i duhovno; situaciju u kojoj osoba to ne bi trebala to činiti dozvoljavao ili ne dozvoljavao joj to zakon.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;Competition makes things get done better.&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Konkurencija čini da se stvari rade bolje.&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The paradigm of competition is a race: by rewarding the winner, we encourage everyone to run faster.  When capitalism really works this way, it does a good job; but its defenders are wrong in assuming it always works this way.  If the runners forget why the reward is offered and become intent on winning, no matter how, they may find other strategies&mdash;such as, attacking other runners.  If the runners get into a fist fight, they will all finish late.
hr: Paradigma konkurencije je utrka: nagrađivanjem pobjednika, potičemo svakoga da trči brže. Kada kapitalizam stvarno radi na ovaj način, tada čini dobar posao; no njegovi branitelji su u krivu kada pretpostavljaju da uvijek radi na ovaj način. Ako trkači zaborave zašto je nagrada ponuđena i postanu usmjereni samo na pobjedu, bez obzira na način, mogu pronaći i druge strategije&mdash;poput napadanja drugih trkača. Ako se trkači počnu tući, svi će doći kasnije.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Proprietary and secret software is the moral equivalent of runners in a fist fight.  Sad to say, the only referee we've got does not seem to object to fights; he just regulates them (&ldquo;For every ten yards you run, you can fire one shot&rdquo;).  He really ought to break them up, and penalize runners for even trying to fight.
hr: Vlasnički i tajni softver je moralni ekvivalent trkača koji se tuku. Tužno, no čini se da jedini sudac kojeg imamo nema ništa protiv tuče; on samo upravlja njima. (&ldquo;Za svakih deset metara koje prijeđete, smijete napraviti jedan udarac.&rdquo;) Ustvari bi ih trebao razdvojiti, i kazniti trkače što se uopće pokušavaju tući.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;Won't everyone stop programming without a monetary incentive?&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Neće li svi prestati programirati bez novčane naknade?&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Actually, many people will program with absolutely no monetary incentive.  Programming has an irresistible fascination for some people, usually the people who are best at it.  There is no shortage of professional musicians who keep at it even though they have no hope of making a living that way.
hr: Ustvari, mnogi ljudi će programirati bez ikakve novčane naknade. Programiranje izaziva neodoljivu fascinaciju nekim ljudima, obično ljudima koji su u njemu najbolji. Mnogi profesionalni glazbenici nastavljaju svirati makar nemaju nade da će zaraditi za život na taj način.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: But really this question, though commonly asked, is not appropriate to the situation.  Pay for programmers will not disappear, only become less.  So the right question is, will anyone program with a reduced monetary incentive? My experience shows that they will.
hr: No ustvari ovo pitanje, makar ga ljudi često postavljaju, nije odgovarajuće za ovu situaciju. Plaća programerima neće nestati, samo će postati manja. Pa je pravo pitanje, da li će itko programirati sa smanjenom novčanom naknadom? Moje iskustvo pokazuje da hoće.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: For more than ten years, many of the world's best programmers worked at the Artificial Intelligence Lab for far less money than they could have had anywhere else.  They got many kinds of nonmonetary rewards: fame and appreciation, for example.  And creativity is also fun, a reward in itself.
hr: Za više od deset godina, mnogi od najboljih svjetskih programera radili su u Laboratoriju za Umjetnu Inteligenciju za mnogo manje novca nego što bi mogli zaraditi bilo gdje drugdje. Dobili su mnogo različitih ne-novčanih nagrada: slavu i poštovanje, na primjer. A kreativnost je i zabavna, nagrada sama po sebi.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Then most of them left when offered a chance to do the same interesting work for a lot of money.
hr: Tada je većina njih otišla kada su dobili šansu da rade isti interesantan posao za mnogo novca.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: What the facts show is that people will program for reasons other than riches; but if given a chance to make a lot of money as well, they will come to expect and demand it.  Low-paying organizations do poorly in competition with high-paying ones, but they do not have to do badly if the high-paying ones are banned.
hr: Što činjenice pokazuju je da će ljudi programirati za razloge osim bogatstva; ali ako dobiju šansu istovremeno dobiti mnogo novca, počet će očekivati i zahtijevati ga. Organizacije koje slabo plaćaju loše stoje u konkurenciji sa onima koje puno plaćaju, ali ne moraju loše stajati ako se zabrane one koje puno plaćaju.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;We need the programmers desperately.  If they demand that we stop helping our neighbors, we have to obey.&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Očajnički trebamo programere. Ako oni zahtijevaju da prestanemo pomagati našim bližnjima, moramo se pokoriti.&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: You're never so desperate that you have to obey this sort of demand.  Remember: millions for defense, but not a cent for tribute!
hr: Nikada niste toliko očajni da se morate pokoriti ovakvoj vrsti zahtjeva. Zapamtite: milijuni za obranu, no niti jedan cent za slavu!

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dt>
en: <strong>&ldquo;Programmers need to make a living somehow.&rdquo;</strong>
hr: <strong>&ldquo;Programeri nekako moraju preživjeti.&rdquo;</strong>

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: In the short run, this is true.  However, there are plenty of ways that programmers could make a living without selling the right to use a program.  This way is customary now because it brings programmers and businessmen the most money, not because it is the only way to make a living.  It is easy to find other ways if you want to find them.  Here are a number of examples.
hr: U kratkom roku, ovo je istina. No postoje mnogi načini na koje programeri mogu zaraditi za život bez prodaje prava na korištenje programa. Ovaj način je danas uobičajen jer donosi programerima i poslovnim ljudima najviše novca, a ne zato što je to jedini način. Jednostavno je pronaći druge načine ako ih želite pronaći. Evo nekoliko primjera.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: A manufacturer introducing a new computer will pay for the porting of operating systems onto the new hardware.
hr: Proizvođač koji predstavlja novo računalo platit će za prijenos operativnih sustava na novi hardver.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The sale of teaching, handholding and maintenance services could also employ programmers.
hr: Prodaja usluga učenja, držanja za ruke i održavanja također može zapošljavati programere.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Users with related needs can form users' groups, and pay dues.  A group would contract with programming companies to write programs that the group's members would like to use.
hr: Korisnici sa sličnim potrebama mogu osnovati udruge korisnika, i platiti. Udruga bi s programerskim kompanijama ugovorila pisanje programa koje bi članovi grupe željeli koristiti.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: All sorts of development can be funded with a Software Tax:
hr: Mnoge vrste razvoja može se financirati sa Softverskim Porezom:

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: Suppose everyone who buys a computer has to pay x percent of the price as a software tax.  The government gives this to an agency like the NSF to spend on software development.
hr: Pretpostavimo da svatko tko kupi računalo mora platiti x posto cijene kao softverski porez. Vlada to daje agenciji poput NSF koja to troši na razvoj softvera.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: But if the computer buyer makes a donation to software development himself, he can take a credit against the tax.  He can donate to the project of his own choosing&mdash;often, chosen because he hopes to use the results when it is done.  He can take a credit for any amount of donation up to the total tax he had to pay.
hr: No ako kupac računala odluči sam napraviti donaciju za razvoj softvera, može mu se odbiti takav porez. Može donirati na projekt koji sam bira&mdash;često, odabran jer se nada da će moći koristiti rezultate kada bude gotov. Može odbiti porez u iznosu bilo koje količine donacije do razine za koju bi inače morao platiti.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The total tax rate could be decided by a vote of the payers of the tax, weighted according to the amount they will be taxed on.
hr: Ukupna razina poreza može se odrediti glasanjem osoba koje plaćaju porez, određena prema količini na koju će biti oporezovani.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><p>
en: The consequences:
hr: Posljedice:

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><ul><li>
en: The computer-using community supports software development.
hr: Zajednica korisnika računala podržava razvoj softvera.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><ul><li>
en: This community decides what level of support is needed.
hr: Ova zajednica odlučuje koju količinu podrške trebaju.

note: type: Content of: <div><dl><dd><ul><li>
en: Users who care which projects their share is spent on can choose this for themselves.
hr: Korisnici koje zanima koji projekti će dobiti njihov novac mogu ovo sami odabrati.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: In the long run, making programs free is a step toward the postscarcity world, where nobody will have to work very hard just to make a living.  People will be free to devote themselves to activities that are fun, such as programming, after spending the necessary ten hours a week on required tasks such as legislation, family counseling, robot repair and asteroid prospecting.  There will be no need to be able to make a living from programming.
hr: Na duljem roku, pretvaranje programa u slobodne, korak je prema svijetu bez nestašice, gdje nitko ne treba raditi vrlo mnogo samo zato da bi zaradio za život. Ljudi će biti slobodni da se posvete aktivnostima koje su zabavne, poput programiranja, nakon što provedu potrebnih deset sati na tjedan na zahtijevanim zadaćama poput zakonodavstva, savjetovanja obitelji, popravljanja robota i pregledavanja asteroida. Neće biti potrebe da se zarađuje za život od programiranja.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: We have already greatly reduced the amount of work that the whole society must do for its actual productivity, but only a little of this has translated itself into leisure for workers because much nonproductive activity is required to accompany productive activity.  The main causes of this are bureaucracy and isometric struggles against competition.  Free software will greatly reduce these drains in the area of software production.  We must do this, in order for technical gains in productivity to translate into less work for us.
hr: Već smo mnogo smanjili količinu posla koje cijelo društvo mora činiti za svoju stvarnu produktivnost, no vrlo malo toga se prenijelo u slobodu za radnike jer mnogo neproduktivne aktivnosti je nužno da bi se pružila potpora produktivnim aktivnostima. Glavni razlozi su birokracija i izometričke borbe protiv konkurencije. Slobodni softver će snažno smanjiti ove probleme u područjima softverske produkcije. Ovo moramo učiniti, kako bismo pretvorili tehničke dobitke u produktivnosti u manje posla za nas same.

note: type: Content of: <div><h3>
en: Footnotes
hr: Bilješke

note: type: Content of: <div><ol><li>
en: The wording here was careless.  The intention was that nobody would have to pay for <b>permission</b> to use the GNU system.  But the words don't make this clear, and people often interpret them as saying that copies of GNU should always be distributed at little or no charge.  That was never the intent; later on, the manifesto mentions the possibility of companies providing the service of distribution for a profit.  Subsequently I have learned to distinguish carefully between &ldquo;free&rdquo; in the sense of freedom and &ldquo;free&rdquo; in the sense of price.  Free software is software that users have the freedom to distribute and change.  Some users may obtain copies at no charge, while others pay to obtain copies&mdash;and if the funds help support improving the software, so much the better.  The important thing is that everyone who has a copy has the freedom to cooperate with others in using it.
hr: Način na koji je ovo sročeno bio je nepažljiv. (U engleskom originalu, &ldquo;<i>free</i>&rdquo; znači i slobodno i besplatno.) Ovdje se htjelo reći da nitko ne treba platiti za <b>dozvolu</b> da koristi GNU sustav. No riječi u engleskom originalu ovo nisu ovo izravno razjasnile, te ih ljudi često shvaćaju kao da kažu da kopije GNU-a trebaju biti uvijek distribuirane jeftino ili besplatno. Ovo nikad nije bila namjera; kasnije, manifest spominje mogućnost da kompanije nude uslugu distribucije za profit. Kasnije sam shvatio da oprezno treba razlikovati &ldquo;<i>free</i>&rdquo; u značenju slobode i &ldquo;<i>free</i>&rdquo; u smislu cijene. Slobodni softver je softver za koji korisnici imaju slobodu distribucije i promjene. Neki korisnici mogu nabaviti kopije besplatno, dok drugi plaćaju za nabavku kopija&mdash;a ako sredstva pomognu u poboljšavanju softvera, time bolje. Važna stvar je da svatko tko ima kopiju ima i slobodu da surađuje s drugima u njenom korištenju.

note: type: Content of: <div><ol><li>
en: Several such companies now exist.
hr: Danas postoji više takvih kompanija.

note: type: Content of: <div><ol><li>
en: A group of computer companies pooled funds around 1991 to support maintenance of the GNU C Compiler.
hr: Grupa računalnih kompanija je skupila novac oko 1991. da bi podržala razvoj GNU C kompajlera.

note: type: Content of: <div><ol><li>
en: I think I was mistaken in saying that proprietary software was the most common basis for making money in software.  It seems that actually the most common business model was and is development of custom software.  That does not offer the possibility of collecting rents, so the business has to keep doing real work in order to keep getting income.  The custom software business would continue to exist, more or less unchanged, in a free software world.  Therefore, I no longer expect that most paid programmers would earn less in a free software world.
hr: Mislim da sam pogriješio kada sam rekao da je vlasnički softver najčešći temelj za zaradu novca od softvera. Čini se da je, ustvari, najčešći poslovni model bio i jest, razvoj softvera po narudžbi. To ne nudi mogućnost da se prikupljaju najmovi, dakle tvrtka mora nastaviti raditi stvaran posao da bi održala dobivanje dohotka. Posao softvera po narudžbi bi nastavio postojati, više-manje nepromijenjen, u svijetu slobodnog softvera. Prema tome, više ne očekujem da će većina plaćenih programera zarađivati manje u svijetu slobodnog softvera.

note: TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes. type: Content of: <div>
en: *GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S NOTES*
hr: <h3>Bilješke prevoditelja</h3><ol><li id="TransNote1">Naime, u engleskom se riječ &ldquo;gnu&rdquo; (životinja) izgovara kao i &ldquo;new&rdquo; (novo).</li></ol>

note: type: Content of: <div><div><p>
en: Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.  There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
hr: Molim vas šaljite općenite FSF &amp; GNU upite na <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>. Postoje isto i <a href="/contact/">drugi načini kontaktiranja</a> FSF-a. Prekinute poveznice i drugi ispravci ili prijedlozi mogu biti poslani na <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Permission is granted to anyone to make or distribute verbatim copies of this document, in any medium, provided that the copyright notice and permission notice are preserved, and that the distributor grants the recipient permission for further redistribution as permitted by this notice.
hr: Dozvola je dana svakome da napravi ili distribuira doslovne kopije ovog dokumenta, u svakom mediju, s time da obavijest o autorskim pravima i obavijest o dozvoli budu očuvani, i da distributer dodijeli primatelju dozvolu za daljnju ponovnu distribuciju na način kako je dozvoljeno u ovoj obavijesti.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Modified versions may not be made.
hr: Izmijenjene inačice ne mogu se napraviti.

note: TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits. type: Content of: <div><div>
en: *GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S CREDITS*
hr: <b>Prijevod</b>: Ivan Vucica, 2007. Marin Rameša, 2013.

note: timestamp start type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Updated:
hr: Zadnji put promijenjeno:
