pragmatic.html - en to hr translation catalogue (29 entries)

note: type: Content of: <title>
en: Copyleft: Pragmatic Idealism - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
hr: Copyleft: pragmatični idealizam - Projekt GNU - Zaklada za slobodni softver

note: type: Content of: <div><h2>
en: Copyleft: Pragmatic Idealism
hr: Copyleft: pragmatični idealizam

note: type: Content of: <div><address>
en: by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</a>
hr: napisao <a href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Every decision a person makes stems from the person's values and goals.  People can have many different goals and values; fame, profit, love, survival, fun, and freedom, are just some of the goals that a good person might have.  When the goal is a matter of principle, we call that idealism.
hr: Svaka odluka koju osoba napravi proizlazi iz vrijednosti i ciljeva te osobe. Ljudi mogu imati mnogo različitih ciljeva i vrijednosti; slava, dobit, ljubav, preživljavanje, zabava i sloboda - samo su neki od ciljeva koje bi dobra osoba mogla imati. Kada je cilj stvar principa, mi to zovemo idealizmom.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: My work on free software is motivated by an idealistic goal: spreading freedom and cooperation.  I want to <a href="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html">encourage free software to spread</a>, replacing proprietary software that forbids cooperation, and thus make our society better.
hr: Moj rad na slobodnom softveru je motiviran idealističkim ciljem: širenje slobode i suradnje. Želim <a href="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html">ohrabriti širenje slobodnog softvera</a>, zamjenjujući vlasnički softver koji zabranjuje suradnju, i time poboljšati naše društvo.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: That's the basic reason why the GNU General Public License is written the way it is&mdash;as a <a href="/licenses/copyleft.html"> copyleft</a>.  All code added to a GPL-covered program must be free software, even if it is put in a separate file.  I make my code available for use in free software, and not for use in proprietary software, in order to encourage other people who write software to make it free as well.  I figure that since proprietary software developers use copyright to stop us from sharing, we cooperators can use copyright to give other cooperators an advantage of their own: they can use our code.
hr: To je temeljni razlog zašto je GNU opća javna licenca napisana tako kako jest&mdash;kao <a href="/licenses/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>. Sav kod nadodan GPL pokrivenom programu mora biti slobodan softver, čak iako je stavljen u odvojenu datoteku. Radim dostupnim svoj kod za korištenje u slobodnom softveru, a ne za korištenje u vlasničkom softveru, da bi ohrabrio druge ljude koji pišu softver da ga isto tako naprave slobodnim. Procjenjujem da pošto developeri vlasničkog softvera koriste autorska prava da nas zaustave u razmjeni, mi koji surađujemo možemo koristiti autorsko pravo da damo drugima koji surađuju svojstvenu prednost: oni mogu koristiti naš kod.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Not everyone who uses the GNU GPL has this goal.  Many years ago, a friend of mine was asked to rerelease a copylefted program under noncopyleft terms, and he responded more or less like this:
hr: Nema svatko tko koristi GNU GPL taj cilj. Prije mnogo godina, moj prijatelj je zapitan da ponovno objavi program, koji je bio pod copyleftom, pod pravilima ne-copylefta, i on je na to odgovorio manje više ovako:

note: type: Content of: <div><blockquote><p>
en: &ldquo;Sometimes I work on free software, and sometimes I work on proprietary software&mdash;but when I work on proprietary software, I expect to get <em>paid</em>.&rdquo;
hr: &ldquo;Ponekad radim na slobodnom softveru, i ponekad radim na vlasničkom softveru&mdash;ali kada radim na vlasničkom softveru, očekujem da ću biti <em>plaćen</em>.&rdquo;

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: He was willing to share his work with a community that shares software, but saw no reason to give a handout to a business making products that would be off-limits to our community.  His goal was different from mine, but he decided that the GNU GPL was useful for his goal too.
hr: Imao je volju da podijeli svoj rad sa zajednicom koja razmjenjuje softver, ali nije vidio razlog da daje poklon tvrtki koja radi proizvode koji bi bili izvan dosega naše zajednice. Njegov cilj je bio drugačiji od moga, ali je odlučio da je GNU GPL isto korisna za njegov cilj.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: If you want to accomplish something in the world, idealism is not enough&mdash;you need to choose a method that works to achieve the goal.  In other words, you need to be &ldquo;pragmatic.&rdquo; Is the GPL pragmatic? Let's look at its results.
hr: Ako želite nešto postići u svijetu, idealizam nije dovoljan&mdash;morate izabrati funkcionalnu metodu da biste dostigli cilj. Drugim riječima, trebate biti &ldquo;pragmatični.&rdquo; Da li je GPL pragmatična? Pogledajmo njene rezultate.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Consider GNU C++.  Why do we have a free C++ compiler? Only because the GNU GPL said it had to be free.  GNU C++ was developed by an industry consortium, MCC, starting from the GNU C compiler.  MCC normally makes its work as proprietary as can be.  But they made the C++ front end free software, because the GNU GPL said that was the only way they could release it.  The C++ front end included many new files, but since they were meant to be linked with GCC, the GPL did apply to them.  The benefit to our community is evident.
hr: Razmotrite GNU C++. Zašto imamo slobodan C++ kompajler? Samo zato jer je GNU GPL rekla da mora biti slobodan. GNU C++ je razvijen od strane industrijskog konzorcija: MCC, počevši od GNU C kompajlera. MCC normalno radi svoje djelo vlasničkim onoliko koliko ono vlasničko može biti. Ali su napravili C++ sučelje slobodnim softverom, zato jer je GNU GPL rekla da je to jedini način na koji oni mogu to objaviti. C++ sučelje uključuje mnogo novih datoteka, ali pošto su te datoteke bile namijenjene da se povežu sa GCC-om, GPL ih je obuhvatila. Korist za našu zajednicu je očita.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Consider GNU Objective C.  NeXT initially wanted to make this front end proprietary; they proposed to release it as <samp>.o</samp> files, and let users link them with the rest of GCC, thinking this might be a way around the GPL's requirements.  But our lawyer said that this would not evade the requirements, that it was not allowed.  And so they made the Objective C front end free software.
hr: Razmotrite GNU objektni C. NeXT je inicijalno želio napraviti to sučelje vlasničkim; oni su predložili da ga objave kao <samp>.o</samp> datoteke, i da dopuste korisnicima da ih povežu sa ostatkom GCC-a, misleći da bi to bio način izbjegavanja GPL zahtjeva. Ali naš odvjetnik je rekao da to ne bi izbjegnulo zahtjeve, da to nije dopušteno. I tako su napravili sučelje objektnog C-a slobodnim softverom.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Those examples happened years ago, but the GNU GPL continues to bring us more free software.
hr: Ti primjeri su se dogodili pred više godina, ali GNU GPL nam i dalje nastavlja donositi još više softvera.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Many GNU libraries are covered by the GNU Lesser General Public License, but not all.  One GNU library which is covered by the ordinary GNU GPL is Readline, which implements command-line editing.  I once found out about a nonfree program which was designed to use Readline, and told the developer this was not allowed.  He could have taken command-line editing out of the program, but what he actually did was rerelease it under the GPL.  Now it is free software.
hr: Mnoge GNU biblioteke su pokrivene GNU nižom općom javnom licencom, ali ne sve. Jedna GNU biblioteka koja je pokrivena običnim GNU GPL-om je Readline, koja implementira uređivanje naredbenog retka. Jednom sam doznao za neslobodni program koji je bio dizajnirani da koristi Readline, i rekao sam developeru da to nije dopušteno. On je mogao ukloniti uređivanje naredbenog retka iz programa, ali ono što je zapravo napravio bila je ponovna objava programa pod GPL-om. Sada je program slobodan softver.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: The programmers who write improvements to GCC (or Emacs, or Bash, or Linux, or any GPL-covered program) are often employed by companies or universities.  When the programmer wants to return his improvements to the community, and see his code in the next release, the boss may say, &ldquo;Hold on there&mdash;your code belongs to us! We don't want to share it; we have decided to turn your improved version into a proprietary software product.&rdquo;
hr: Programeri koji pišu poboljšanja za GCC (ili Emacs, ili Bash, ili Linux, ili bilo koji drugi program pokriven GPL-om) su često zaposleni od strane kompanija ili sveučilišta. Kada programer želi vratiti svoja poboljšanja natrag u zajednicu, i vidjeti svoj kod u slijedećoj objavi, šef može reći: &ldquo;Pričekajte&mdash;vaš kod pripada nama! Mi ne želimo podijeliti kod; odlučili smo da ćemo pretvoriti vašu poboljšanu inačicu u proizvod vlasničkog softvera.&rdquo;

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Here the GNU GPL comes to the rescue.  The programmer shows the boss that this proprietary software product would be copyright infringement, and the boss realizes that he has only two choices: release the new code as free software, or not at all.  Almost always he lets the programmer do as he intended all along, and the code goes into the next release.
hr: Ovdje GNU GPL spašava stvar. Programer pokaže šefu da bi taj proizvod vlasničkog softvera bio prekršaj autorskih prava, i šef shvati da ima samo dva izbora: objaviti novi kod kao slobodan softver, ili ga uopće ne objaviti. Skoro uvijek on dopusti programeru da napravi kako je programer naumio cijelo vrijeme, i kod uđe u slijedeću objavu.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: The GNU GPL is not Mr. Nice Guy.  It says no to some of the things that people sometimes want to do.  There are users who say that this is a bad thing&mdash;that the GPL &ldquo;excludes&rdquo; some proprietary software developers who &ldquo;need to be brought into the free software community.&rdquo;
hr: GNU GPL ne dopušta sve. Kaže &ldquo;Ne&rdquo; nekim stvarima koje ljudi ponekad žele napraviti. Postoje korisnici koji kažu da je to loša stvar&mdash;da GPL &ldquo;isključuje&rdquo; neke developere vlasničkog softvera koji bi &ldquo;trebali biti dovedeni u zajednicu slobodnog softvera.&rdquo;

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: But we are not excluding them from our community; they are choosing not to enter.  Their decision to make software proprietary is a decision to stay out of our community.  Being in our community means joining in cooperation with us; we cannot &ldquo;bring them into our community&rdquo; if they don't want to join.
hr: Ali mi ih ne isključujemo iz naše zajednice; oni biraju da ne uđu. Njihova odluka da naprave softver vlasničkim je odluka da stoje izvan naše zajednice. Bivanje u našoj zajednici znači pridruživanje u suradnji s nama; ne možemo ih &ldquo;dovesti u našu zajednicu&rdquo; ako se oni sami ne žele pridružiti.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: What we <em>can</em> do is offer them an inducement to join.  The GNU GPL is designed to make an inducement from our existing software: &ldquo;If you will make your software free, you can use this code.&rdquo; Of course, it won't win 'em all, but it wins some of the time.
hr: Što <em>možemo</em> napraviti je ponuditi im povod da se pridruže. GNU GPL je dizajnirana da napravi povode iz našeg postojećeg softvera: &ldquo;Ako ćete napraviti svoj softver slobodnim, vi možete koristiti taj kod.&rdquo; Naravno, ovo neće pridobiti sve, ali pridobije neke ponekad.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Proprietary software development does not contribute to our community, but its developers often want handouts from us.  Free software users can offer free software developers strokes for the ego&mdash;recognition and gratitude&mdash;but it can be very tempting when a business tells you, &ldquo;Just let us put your package in our proprietary program, and your program will be used by many thousands of people!&rdquo; The temptation can be powerful, but in the long run we are all better off if we resist it.
hr: Razvijanje vlasničkog softvera ne pridonosi našoj zajednici, ali njegovi developeri često žele poklone od nas. Korisnici slobodnog softvera mogu ponuditi developerima slobodnog softvera poglađivanje ega&mdash;priznanje i zahvalnost&mdash;ali može biti veliko iskušenje kada vam tvrtka kaže: &ldquo;Samo nam dozvolite da stavimo vaš paket u naš vlasnički program, i vaš program će biti korišten od strane mnogih tisuća ljudi!&rdquo; Iskušenje može biti moćno, ali na duže staze svima nam je bolje ako odolimo tom iskušenju.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: The temptation and pressure are harder to recognize when they come indirectly, through free software organizations that have adopted a policy of catering to proprietary software.  The X Consortium (and its successor, the Open Group) offers an example: funded by companies that made proprietary software, they strived for a decade to persuade programmers not to use copyleft.  When the Open Group tried to <a href="/philosophy/x.html">make X11R6.4 nonfree software</a>, those of us who had resisted that pressure were glad that we did.
hr: Iskušenje i pritisak su teški za prepoznati kada dolaze indirektno, kroz organizacije slobodnog softvera koje su prihvatile politiku pružanja usluga vlasničkom softveru. X konzorcij (i njegov nasljednik, Otvorena grupa [<i>Open Group</i>]) nude primjer: financirani od strane kompanija koje rade vlasnički softver, oni su kroz desetljeće nastojali uvjeriti programere da ne koriste copyleft. Kada je Otvorena grupa pokušala <a href="/philosophy/x.html">napraviti X11R6.4 neslobodnim softverom</a>, oni od nas koji su odoljeli tom pritisku smo bili zadovoljni što smo tako napravili.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: In September 1998, several months after X11R6.4 was released with nonfree distribution terms, the Open Group reversed its decision and rereleased it under the same noncopyleft free software license that was used for X11R6.3.  Thank you, Open Group&mdash;but this subsequent reversal does not invalidate the conclusions we draw from the fact that adding the restrictions was <em>possible</em>.
hr: U rujnu 1998., nekoliko mjeseci nakon što je X11R6.4 bio objavljen prema neslobodnim distribucijskim pravilima, Otvorena grupa je preokrenula svoju odluku i ponovno objavila softver pod istom ne-copyleft licencom slobodnog softvera koja je bila korištena za X11R6.3. Hvala vam, Otvorena grupo&mdash;ali to naknadno preokretanje ne poništava zaključke koje radimo iz činjenice da je dodavanje ograničenja bilo <em>moguće</em>.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Pragmatically speaking, thinking about greater long-term goals will strengthen your will to resist this pressure.  If you focus your mind on the freedom and community that you can build by staying firm, you will find the strength to do it.  &ldquo;Stand for something, or you will fall for anything.&rdquo;
hr: Pragmatično govoreći, mišljenje o većim ciljevima na duge staze će osnažiti vašu volju da odolite tom pritisku. Ako fokusirate svoj um na slobodu i zajednicu koju možete izgraditi ako stojite čvrsto, naći ćete snagu da to napravite. &ldquo;Podržavajte nešto, ili ćete pasti za bilo što.&rdquo;

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: And if cynics ridicule freedom, ridicule community&hellip;if &ldquo;hard-nosed realists&rdquo; say that profit is the only ideal&hellip;just ignore them, and use copyleft all the same.
hr: I ako cinici ismijavaju slobodu, ismijavaju zajednicu&hellip;ako &ldquo;tvrdoglavi realisti&rdquo; kažu da je dobit jedini ideal&hellip;samo ne obraćajte pažnju na njih, i svejedno koristite copyleft.

note: type: Content of: <div><div><p>
en: This essay is published in <a href="https://shop.fsf.org/product/free-software-free-society/"><cite>Free Software, Free Society: The Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman</cite></a>.
hr: Ovaj esej je objavljen u <a href="https://shop.fsf.org/product/free-software-free-society/"><cite>Free Software, Free Society: The Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman</cite></a>.

note: type: Content of: <div><div><p>
en: Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.  There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
hr: Molimo vas, općenite upite o FSF &amp; GNU šaljite na <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>. Postoje i <a href="/contact/">drugi načini kontaktiranja</a> FSF-a. Prekinute poveznice i ostale ispravke ili prijedloge možete poslati na <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: This page is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.
hr: Ovo djelo je dano na korištenje pod licencom <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.hr">Creative Commons Imenovanje-Bez prerada 4.0 međunarodna</a>.

note: TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits. type: Content of: <div><div>
en: *GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S CREDITS*
hr: <b>Prijevod</b>: Marin Rameša, 2013.

note: timestamp start type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Updated:
hr: Zadnji put promijenjeno:
