ubuntu-spyware.html - en to hr_HR translation catalogue (20 entries)

note: type: Content of: <title>
en: Ubuntu Spyware: What to Do? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
hr_HR: Ubuntu je špijunski softver: Što učiniti? - Projekt GNU - Zaklada za slobodan softver

note: type: Content of: <div><h2>
en: Ubuntu Spyware: What to Do?
hr_HR: Ubuntu je špijunski softver: Što učiniti?

note: type: Content of: <div><address>
en: by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</a>
hr_HR: napisao <a href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Proprietary software is associated with malicious treatment of the user: surveillance code, digital handcuffs (DRM or Digital Restrictions Management) to restrict users, and back doors that can do nasty things under remote control.  Programs that do any of these things are malware and should be treated as such.  Widely used examples include Windows, the <a href="/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html">iThings</a>, and the Amazon &ldquo;Kindle&rdquo; product for virtual book burning, which do all three; Macintosh and the Playstation III which impose DRM; most portable phones, which do spying and have back doors; Adobe Flash Player, which does spying and enforces DRM; and plenty of apps for iThings and Android, which are guilty of one or more of these nasty practices.
hr_HR: Vlasnički je softver povezan sa zlonamjernim postupcima prema korisniku: ubačeni kod za nadzor, digitalne lisice (DRM ili upravljanje digitalnim ograničenjima) i skriveni udaljeni pristup računalu mogu korisniku učiniti dosta neugodnih stvari. Programe koji rade takve stvari treba tretirati jednako kao i špijunski softver (malware). Najčešći su primjeri Windows,  <a href="/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html">iProizvodi</a> i Amazon &ldquo;Kindle&rdquo;, koji koriste sva tri postupka; Macintosh i Playstation III, koji su nametnuli DRM, većina mobilnih telefona, koji špijuniraju korisnike i pružaju skriveni pristup uređaju; Adobe Flash Player, koji špijunira i nameće DRM, te mnoge aplikacije za iPhone i Android, koje rade jednu ili više ovakvih ružnih stvari.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: <a href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html"> Free software gives users a chance to protect themselves from malicious software behaviors</a>.  Even better, usually the community protects everyone, and most users don't have to move a muscle.  Here's how.
hr_HR: <a href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">Slobodan softver korisniku pruža priliku da se zaštiti od zlonamjernog softvera</a>. Osim toga, najčešće zajednica štiti sve korisnike, tako da većina ljudi ne mora ništa učiniti da bi se zaštitila. Evo na koji način.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: This is just like the first surveillance practice I learned about in Windows.  My late friend Fravia told me that when he searched for a string in the files of his Windows system, it sent a packet to some server, which was detected by his firewall.  Given that first example I paid attention and learned about the propensity of &ldquo;reputable&rdquo; proprietary software to be malware.  Perhaps it is no coincidence that Ubuntu sends the same information.
hr_HR: To je upravo poput prvog slučaja nadzora u Windowsima s kojima sam se upoznao. Moj mi je pokojni prijatelj Fravia ispričao da, dok je u lokalnim datotekama Windowsa tražio neki izraz, njegov vatrozid je otkrio slanje paketa nekakvom serveru. Nakon tog prvog primjera, počeo sam obraćati pozornost na takve stvari, te uočio sklonost vlasničkog softvera &ldquo;uglednih&rdquo; softverskih firmi prema špijuniranju. Možda i nije tek stjecaj okolnosti da Ubuntu šalje iste informacije.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: People will certainly make a modified version of Ubuntu without this surveillance.  In fact, several GNU/Linux distros are modified versions of Ubuntu.  When those update to the latest Ubuntu as a base, I expect they will remove this.  Canonical surely expects that too.
hr_HR: Ljudi će vjerojatno napraviti prerađene inačice Ubuntua bez takvog nadzora. U stvari, nekoliko GNU/Linux distribucija je nastalo od Ubuntua. Kad se te distribucije ažuriraju na novu Ubuntuovu osnovu, očekujem da će izbaciti nadzor iz svojih inačica. To svakako očekuje i Canonical.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Most free software developers would abandon such a plan given the prospect of a mass switch to someone else's corrected version.  But Canonical has not abandoned the Ubuntu spyware.  Perhaps Canonical figures that the name &ldquo;Ubuntu&rdquo; has so much momentum and influence that it can avoid the usual consequences and get away with surveillance.
hr_HR: Većina bi razvijatelja slobodnog softvera napustila ovakav plan ako bi imala priliku prebaciti se na drugu, ispravljenu verziju. Ali Canonical nije napustio Ubuntu spyware. Vjerojatno Canonical računa da ime &ldquo;Ubuntu&rdquo; ima toliki momenat i utjecaj da može izbjeći uobičajene posljedice i izvući se s nadziranjem korisnika.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Canonical says this feature searches the Internet in other ways.  Depending on the details, that might or might not make the problem bigger, but not smaller.
hr_HR: Canonical tvrdi da se internet tako samo pretražuje na drugačiji način. Ovisno o detaljima, to može učiniti problem većim, ali svakako ne manjim.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Ubuntu allows users to switch the surveillance off.  Clearly Canonical thinks that many Ubuntu users will leave this setting in the default state (on).  And many may do so, because it doesn't occur to them to try to do anything about it.  Thus, the existence of that switch does not make the surveillance feature ok.
hr_HR: Ubuntu dopušta korisniku isključivanje nadzora. Očito je da u Canonicalu misle da će većina korisnika Ubuntua ostaviti nadzor uključenim. I mnogi to i čine, zato što nisu svjesni toga i da bi trebali nešto učiniti s tim u vezi. Tako da postojanje tog prekidača ne čini samim time i nadzor opravdanim.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Even if it were disabled by default, the feature would still be dangerous: &ldquo;opt in, once and for all&rdquo; for a risky practice, where the risk varies depending on details, invites carelessness.  To protect users' privacy, systems should make prudence easy: when a local search program has a network search feature, it should be up to the user to choose network search explicitly <em>each time</em>.  This is easy: all it takes is to have separate buttons for network searches and local searches, as earlier versions of Ubuntu did.  A network search feature should also inform the user clearly and concretely about who will get what personal information of hers, if and when she uses the feature.
hr_HR: Čak i da je špijuniranje u startu onemogućeno, i dalje bi bilo opasno. &ldquo;Uključivanje za stalno&rdquo; u riskantne pothvate, gdje rizik ovisi o detaljima, stvara nemarnost. Da bi se zaštitila privatnost korisnika, sustav mora omogućiti da oprez i obazrivost pri upotrebi budu jednostavno dostižni: ako lokalni program za pretragu ima opciju za pretraživanje mreže, korisnik mora imati posebnu opciju da <em>svaki put</em> isključivo izabere mrežno pretraživanje ako to želi.  To nije teško napraviti. Potrebno je samo postaviti posebnu dugmad za mrežno i lokalno pretraživanje, kako je uostalom i bilo na prijašnjim verzijama Ubuntua. Mrežna pretraga bi također trebala informirati korisnika kome šalje te osobne informacije i koje informacije šalje.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: If a sufficient part of our community's opinion leaders view this issue in personal terms only, if they switch the surveillance off for themselves and continue to promote Ubuntu, Canonical might get away with it.  That would be a great loss to the free software community.
hr_HR: Ako većina vodećih mislilaca u našoj zajednici vide ovo kao osobni problem svakog korisnika, ako sami na svom sustavu isključe nadzor i nastave promovirati Ubuntu, Canonical bi se mogao izvući s tom praksom. To bi načinilo veliku šteta zajednici slobodnog softvera.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: We who present free software as a defense against malware do not say it is a perfect defense.  No perfect defense is known.  We don't say the community will deter malware <em>without fail</em>.  Thus, strictly speaking, the Ubuntu spyware example doesn't mean we have to eat our words.
hr_HR: Mi koji predstavljamo slobodni softver kao obranu od malwarea, ne kažemo da je ta obrana savršena. Ne postoji savršena obrana. Mi ne kažemo da je zajednica u stanju držati malware podalje <em>bez ijedne greške</em>, tako da primjer s Ubuntu-ovim špijunskim softverom ne znači da moramo priznati da nismo u pravu.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: But there's more at stake here than whether some of us have to eat some words.  What's at stake is whether our community can effectively use the argument based on proprietary spyware.  If we can only say, &ldquo;free software won't spy on you, unless it's Ubuntu,&rdquo; that's much less powerful than saying, &ldquo;free software won't spy on you.&rdquo;
hr_HR: Ali ovdje je u igri nešto više od toga tko je u pravu a tko nije. U pitanju je to može li naša zajednica pravilno koristiti argument o zlonamjernom vlasničkom softveru. Ako možemo reći samo da  &ldquo;vas slobodni softver neće špijunirati osim ako to nije Ubuntu,&rdquo;, to ima puno manju snagu nego ako se kaže &ldquo;slobodni vas softver neće uopće špijunirati.&rdquo;

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: It behooves us to give Canonical whatever rebuff is needed to make it stop this.  Any excuse Canonical offers is inadequate; even if it used all the money it gets from Amazon to develop free software, that can hardly overcome what free software will lose if it ceases to offer an effective way to avoid abuse of the users.
hr_HR: Na nama bi bilo da učinimo sve što je potrebno da se Canonical spriječi u takvoj praksi. Bilo kakav izgovor Canonicala je neprihvatljiv. Čak i da iskoriste sav novac koji dobiju od Amazona za razvoj slobodnog softvera, to neće nadoknaditi ono što će slobodni softver izgubiti ako prestane nuditi dobar način zaštite korisnika od zlostavljanja.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: If you ever recommend or redistribute GNU/Linux, please remove Ubuntu from the distros you recommend or redistribute.  If its practice of installing and recommending nonfree software didn't convince you to stop, let this convince you.  In your install fests, in your Software Freedom Day events, in your FLISOL events, don't install or recommend Ubuntu.  Instead, tell people that Ubuntu is shunned for spying.
hr_HR: Ako budete preporučivali ili instalirali nekome GNU/Linux, molim vas da isključite Ubuntu sa popisa distribucija koje preporučujete. Ako vas dosad nije uvjerila praksa Ubuntua da instaliraju i preporučuju neslobodni softver, neka vam ovo bude pouka. Na vašim instal-feštama, na Danima slobodnog softvera itd., nemojte instalirati niti preporučivati Ubuntu. Umjesto toga, recite ljudima da Ubuntu treba izbjegavati zbog špijuniranja.

note: type: Content of: <div><div><p>
en: Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.  There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
hr_HR: Molim vas šaljite općenite FSF &amp; GNU upite na <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.  Postoje isto i <a href="/contact/">drugi načini kontaktiranja</a> FSF-a. Prekinute poveznice i drugi ispravci ili prijedlozi mogu biti poslani na <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: This page is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.
hr_HR: Ovo djelo je dano na korištenje pod licencom <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.hr">Creative Commons Imenovanje-Bez prerada 4.0 međunarodna</a>.

note: TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits. type: Content of: <div><div>
en: *GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S CREDITS*
hr_HR:  Prijevod: JK, 2013.

note: timestamp start type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Updated:
hr_HR: Vrijeme zadnje izmjene:
