use-free-software.html - en to hr translation catalogue (19 entries)

note: type: Content of: <title>
en: The Free Software Community After 20 Years - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
hr: Zajednica slobodnog softvera nakon 20 godina - Projekt GNU - Zaklada za slobodan softver

note: type: Content of: <div><h2>
en: The Free Software Community After 20 Years:
hr: Zajednica slobodnog softvera nakon 20 godina:

note: type: Content of: <div><h3>
en: With great but incomplete success, what now?
hr: Velik, ali nepotpun uspjeh. Što sada?

note: type: Content of: <div><address>
en: by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</a>
hr: napisao <a href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</a>

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: It was 5 Jan 1984, twenty years ago today, that I quit my job at MIT to begin developing a free software operating system, <a href="/gnu/thegnuproject.html">GNU</a>.  While we have never released a complete GNU system suitable for production use, a variant of the GNU system is now used by tens of millions of people who mostly are not aware it is such.  Free software does not mean &ldquo;gratis&rdquo;; it means that users are free to run the program, study the source code, change it, and redistribute it either with or without changes, either gratis or for a fee.
hr: 5. siječnja 1984. godine, prije dvadeset godina, napustio sam svoj posao na MIT-u kako bih počeo razvijati slobodan operacijski sustav, <a href="/gnu/thegnuproject.html">GNU</a>. Premda nikada nismo objavili dovršen sustav GNU prikladan za upotrebu u proizvodnom okruženju, inačicu sustava GNU danas koriste deseci milijuna ljudi koji većinom nisu svjesni da je tome tako. Slobodan softver ne znači i &ldquo;besplatan&rdquo;; to znači da su korisnici slobodni pokretati program, proučavati izvorni kod, mijenjati ga i dalje distribuirati s izmjenama ili bez njih, besplatno ili uz naknadu.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: My hope was that a free operating system would open a path to escape forever from the system of subjugation which is proprietary software.  I had experienced the ugliness of the way of life that nonfree software imposes on its users, and I was determined to escape and give others a way to escape.
hr: Nadao sam se da bi slobodan operacijski sustav otvorio put kojim bismo zauvijek pobjegli od podjarmljujućeg sustava kakav je vlasnički softver. Doživio sam ružnoću načina života kojeg neslobodan softver nameće svojim korisnicima te sam odlučio pobjeći od njega i drugima utrti put za bijeg.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Nonfree software carries with it an antisocial system that prohibits cooperation and community.  You are typically unable to see the source code; you cannot tell what nasty tricks, or what foolish bugs, it might contain.  If you don't like it, you are helpless to change it.  Worst of all, you are forbidden to share it with anyone else.  To prohibit sharing software is to cut the bonds of society.
hr: Neslobodan softver donosi sa sobom protudruštveni sustav koji zabranjuje suradnju i zajednicu. Uglavnom niste u mogućnosti vidjeti izvorni kod; ne možete vidjeti kakve ružne trikove ili glupe pogreške može sadržavati. Ako vam se ne sviđa, niste ga u mogućnosti izmijeniti. Najgore od svega, zabranjeno vam ga je dijeliti s bilo kim drugim. Zabraniti dijeljenje softvera znači presjeći veze s društvom.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Today we have a large community of users who run GNU, Linux and other free software.  Thousands of people would like to extend this, and have adopted the goal of convincing more computer users to &ldquo;use free software.&rdquo; But what does it mean to &ldquo;use free software&rdquo;? Does that mean escaping from proprietary software, or merely installing free programs alongside it? Are we aiming to lead people to freedom, or just introduce them to our code? In other words, are we working for freedom, or have we replaced that goal with the shallow goal of popularity?
hr: Danas imamo veliku zajednicu korisnika koji upotrebljavaju GNU, Linux i drugi slobodan softver. Tisuće ljudi željelo bi to proširiti i prihvatili su za cilj uvjeriti još računalnih korisnika da &ldquo;koriste slobodan softver&rdquo;. No, što znači &ldquo;koristiti slobodan softver&rdquo;? Znači li to bijeg od vlasničkog softvera ili samo instaliranje slobodnog softvera uz njega? Ciljamo li uvesti ljude u slobodu ili ih samo upoznati s našim kodom? Drugim riječima, radimo li za slobodu ili smo taj cilj zamijenili plitkim ciljem postizanja popularnosti?

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: It's easy to get in the habit of overlooking this distinction, because in many common situations it makes no difference.  When you're trying to convince a person to try a free program, or to install the <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">GNU/Linux</a> operating system, either goal would lead to the same practical conduct.  However, in other situations the two goals inspire very different actions.
hr: Lako nam prijeđe u naviku previdjeti ovu razliku jer je u mnogim uobičajenim situacijama niti nema. Kada pokušavate uvjeriti osobu da isproba slobodan program ili da instalira operacijski sustav <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">GNU/Linux</a>, i jedan i drugi cilj doveli bi do istog praktičnog rezultata. Međutim, u drugim situacijama ova dva cilja izazivaju vrlo različita djelovanja.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: For instance, what should we say when the nonfree Invidious video driver, the nonfree Prophecy database, or the nonfree Indonesia language interpreter and libraries, is released in a version that runs on GNU/Linux? Should we thank the developers for this &ldquo;support&rdquo; for our system, or should we regard this nonfree program like any other&mdash;as an attractive nuisance, a temptation to accept bondage, a problem to be solved?
hr: Na primjer, što reći kada neslobodan pogonski program za video Invidious, neslobodna baza podataka Prophecy ili neslobodan interpreter i biblioteke jezika Indonesia bude objavljen u inačici koja se može pokrenuti na GNU/Linuxu? Hoćemo li zahvaliti razvijateljima na toj &ldquo;podršci&rdquo; za naš sustav ili ćemo promatrati ovaj neslobodan program kao i svaki drugi&mdash;kao privlačnu napast, iskušenje da prihvatimo lance , problem koji je potrebno riješiti?

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: If you take as your goal the increased popularity of certain free software, if you seek to convince more people to use some free programs some of the time, you might think those nonfree programs are helpful contributions to that goal.  It is hard to dispute the claim that their availability helps make GNU/Linux more popular.  If the widespread use of GNU or Linux is the ultimate goal of our community, we should logically applaud all applications that run on it, whether free or not.
hr: Ako vam je cilj povećanje popularnost određenog slobodnog softvera, ako želite uvjeriti više ljudi da koriste neke slobodne programe neko vrijeme, mogli biste pomisliti da su ti neslobodni programi korisni doprinosi tom cilju. Teško je pobiti tvrdnju da njihova dostupnost pomaže učiniti GNU/Linux popularnijim. Ako je široko rasprostranjeno korištenje GNU-a ili Linuxa krajnji cilj naše zajednice, logički je da bismo trebali pozdravljati sve aplikacije koje se na njemu pokreću, bile one slobodne ili ne.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: But if our goal is freedom, that changes everything.  Users cannot be free while using a nonfree program.  To free the citizens of cyberspace, we have to replace those nonfree programs, not accept them.  They are not contributions to our community, they are temptations to settle for continuing nonfreedom.
hr: No ako je naš cilj sloboda, to onda sve mijenja. Korisnici ne mogu biti slobodni sve dok koriste neki neslobodan program. Kako bismo oslobodili građane kiberprostora, moramo zamijeniti te neslobodne programe, a ne ih prihvatiti. Oni nisu doprinos zajednici, oni su iskušenja kako bismo se pomirili sa stalnom neslobodom.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: There are two common motivations to develop a free program.  One is that there is no program to do the job.  Unfortunately, accepting the use of a nonfree program eliminates that motivation.  The other is the will to be free, which motivates people to write free replacements for nonfree programs.  In cases like these, that motive is the only one that can do the job.  Simply by using a new and unfinished free replacement, before it technically compares with the nonfree model, you can help encourage the free developers to persevere until it becomes superior.
hr: Dvije su uobičajene motivacije za razvoj slobodnog programa. Jedna je ta što ne postoji program koji bi radio određen posao. Nažalost, prihvaćanje korištenja neslobodnog programa otklanja tu motivaciju. Druga je želja da se bude slobodan, što motivira ljude da pišu slobodne zamjene za neslobodne programe. U ovakvim slučajevima, motivacija je jedino što može pomoći.  Jednostavnim korištenjem nove i nedovršene slobodne zamjene neslobodnog programa, prije nego što se u tehničkom pogledu može mjeriti s neslobodnim uzorom, možete pomoći potaknuti slobodne razvijatelje da ustraju sve dok zamjena ne postane bolja od svojeg uzora.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Those nonfree programs are not trivial.  Developing free replacements for them will be a big job; it may take years.  The work may need the help of future hackers, young people today, people yet to be inspired to join the work on free software.  What can we do today to help convince other people, in the future, to maintain the necessary determination and persistence to finish this work?
hr: Ti neslobodni programi nisu jednostavni. Razvijanje slobodnih zamjena za njih bit će velik posao; mogao bi potrajati godinama. Posao može zahtijevati pomoć budućih hakera, današnjih mladih ljudi, ljudi koje tek treba nadahnuti da se pridruže radu na slobodnom softveru. Što danas možemo učiniti kako bismo pomogli uvjeriti druge ljude, u budućnosti, da održe neophodnu odlučnost i ustrajnost da dovrše ovaj posao

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: The most effective way to strengthen our community for the future is to spread understanding of the value of freedom&mdash;to teach more people to recognize the moral unacceptability of nonfree software.  People who value freedom are, in the long term, its best and essential defense.
hr: Najučinkovitiji način da ojačamo našu zajednicu za budućnost jest širenje shvaćanja vrijednosti slobode&mdash;poučiti još više ljudi da prepoznaju moralnu neprihvatljivost neslobodnog softvera. Ljudi koji cijene slobodu su, dugoročno, njena najbolja i ključna obrana

note: type: Content of: <div><div><p>
en: Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.  There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
hr: Molimo vas, općenite upite o FSF &amp; GNU šaljite na <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>. Postoje i <a href="/contact/">drugi načini kontaktiranja</a> FSF-a. Prekinute poveznice i ostale ispravke ili prijedloge možete poslati na <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.

note: type: Content of: <div><p>
en: This page is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.
hr: Ovo djelo je dano na korištenje pod licencom <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.hr">Creative Commons Imenovanje-Bez prerada 4.0 međunarodna</a>.

note: TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits. type: Content of: <div><div>
en: *GNUN-SLOT: TRANSLATOR'S CREDITS*
hr: <b>Prijevod</b>: Nevenko Baričević, 2013.

note: timestamp start type: Content of: <div><p>
en: Updated:
hr: Vrijeme zadnje izmjene:
